Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 93

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimation of Prepractice Hydration Status of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Athletes

Volpe, Stella L., Poule, Kristen A., Bland, Erica G.·2009·Journal of Athletic Training

Abstract

Context: To our knowledge, no one has compared the prepractice hydration status of male and female National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes or has studied the effects of the menstrual cycle phase on women's prepractice hydration status. Objective: To report prepractice hydration status of collegiate athletes and determine the factors that might influence that status. Design: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. Setting: University sports team practices. Patients or Other Participants: Participants included 138 male and 125 female athletes (age = 19.9 ± 1.3 years, height = 165.8 ± 42.9 cm, mass = 77.4 ± 17.5 kg) from an NCAA Division I New England university. Intervention(s): One spontaneously voided (spot) urine sample was collected from each participant before his or her team practice and was measured 2 times. Main Outcome Measure(s): A refractometer was used to analyze the amount of light that passed through a small drop of urine and assess urine specific gravity. Fluid intake and menstrual history for women were also collected. Three hydration-status groups were defined based on the American College of Sports Medicine and National Athletic Trainers' Association criteria: (1) euhydrated, which was urine specific gravity less than 1.020; (2) hypohydrated, from 1.020 to 1.029; and (3) significantly hypohydrated, equal to or more than 1.030. Results: Thirteen percent of student-athletes appeared significantly hypohydrated, with a mean urine specific gravity of 1.031 ± 0.002 (χ 2 = 12.12, P < .05); 53% appeared hypohydrated, with a mean urine specific gravity of 1.024 ± 0.003 (χ 2 = 12.12, P < .05); and 34% appeared euhydrated, with a mean urine specific gravity of 1.012 ± 0.005 (χ 2 = 0.03, P > .05). A greater percentage of men (47%) than women (28%) were hypohydrated (χ 2 = 8.33, P < .05). In women, no difference was evident between the luteal and follicular phases of their menstrual cycles (χ 2 = 0.02, P > .05). Conclusions: Before activity, athletes were hypohydrated at different levels. A greater percentage of men than women were hypohydrated. Menstrual cycle phase did not appear to affect hydration in women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4085/1062-6050-44.6.624

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Food and Nutrition Board: National Academy of Sciences of the Institute of Medicine Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. Washington, DCNational Academy Press. 2005.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Volpe, S. L., Poule, K. A., & Bland, E. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  • University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Venue
Journal of Athletic Training
Published
2009-11
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
624-629
ISSN
1062-6050
Cited by
93
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.