Cited by 73Thermoregulation and physiological responsesSports Performance and TrainingSports injuries and prevention

Sweat Rates, Sweat Sodium Concentrations, and Sodium Losses in 3 Groups of Professional Football Players

Open access
Godek, Sandra Fowkes, Peduzzi, Chris, Burkholder, Richard, Condon, Steve, Dorshimer, Gary, Bartolozzi, Arthur R.·2010·Journal of Athletic Training

Abstract

Context: Sweat sodium losses have never been reported in a large cohort of American football players. Objective: To compare sweat rates (SwtRs), sweat sodium concentrations (SwtNa+), and sodium losses in 3 groups of players (backs and receivers [BK], linebackers and quarterbacks [LB/QB], and linemen [LM]) to determine if positional differences and, therefore, size differences exist. Design: Observational study. Setting: Data were collected during practices in the second week of 2 consecutive training camps. The wet bulb globe temperature was 78.5°F ± 3.5°F (25.9°C ± 1.9°C). Patients or Other Participants: Eighteen BK, 12 LB/QB, and 14 LM volunteered. Intervention(s): Sterile sweat patches were applied to the right forearm after the skin was appropriately cleaned. The patches were removed during practice, placed in sterile tubes, centrifuged, frozen, and later analyzed by flame photometry. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sweat rate, SwtNa+, and sodium loss. We calculated SwtR by change in mass adjusted for urine produced and fluids consumed divided by practice time in hours. Results: Other than age, physical characteristics were different among groups (P < .001). The SwtR was different among groups (F2,41 = 7.3, P = .002). It was lower in BK (1.42 ± 0.45 L/h) than in LB/QB (1.98 ± 0.49 L/h) (P < .05) and LM (2.16 ± 0.75 L/h) (P < .01), but we found no differences between SwtRs for LB/QB and LM. The SwtNa+ was not different among groups (BK = 50 ± 16 mEq/L, LB/QB = 48.2 ± 23 mEq/L, and LM = 52.8 ± 25 mEq/L) and ranged from 15 to 99 mEq/L. Sweat sodium losses ranged from 642 mg/h to 6.7 g/h, and findings for group comparisons approached significance (P = .06). On days when players practiced 4.5 hours, calculated sodium losses ranged from 2.3 to 30 g/d. Conclusions: The BK sweated at lower rates than did the midsized LB/QB and large LM, but LB/QB sweated similarly to LM. Sweat sodium concentration and daily sodium losses ranged considerably. Heavy, salty sweaters require increased dietary consumption of sodium during preseason.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4085/1062-6050-45.4.364

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Profuse sweaters required increased dietary consumption of sodium to compensate for such losses during the preseason.

    “Profuse sweaters required increased dietary consumption of sodium to compensate for such losses during the preseason.”
  • The study showed large variations in sweat Na+ concentration between backs and receivers and linebackers and quarterbacks but not between linebackers and quarterbacks and linemen.

    “The study showed large variations in sweat Na+ concentration between BKs and LB/QB but not between LB/QB and LM.”
  • This study is the first study pertaining to the quantification of sweat sodium losses to monitor hydration in professional NFL players on a single team utilizing an epidermal patch.

    “This study is significant in that it is the first study pertaining to the quantification of sweat sodium losses to monitor hydration in professional NFL players on a single team utilizing an epidermal patch.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 73

Authors
Godek, S. F., Peduzzi, C., Burkholder, R., Condon, S., Dorshimer, G., & Bartolozzi, A. R.
Affiliations
  • West Chester University (US)
  • Philadelphia Eagles, PA
  • Delancy Medical Associates, Philadelphia, PA
  • 3B Orthopedics, Philadelphia, PA
Venue
Journal of Athletic Training
Published
2010-07
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
364-371
ISSN
1062-6050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987707335
Cited by
73
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Athletic Training (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
sweat rate, sweat sodium concentration, sodium loss, American football players, positional differences, linemen, sweat patches, fluid balance, electrolyte loss, body size differences, sodium supplementation, sweat osmolality, sodium bicarbonate
MeSH terms
Adult, Fluid Therapy, Football, Humans, Male, Sodium, Sweating, Water Intoxication, Water-Electrolyte Balance, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Hypovolemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review