Cited by 155Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project: Two-Year Stability of DSM-IV Diagnoses in 500 First-Episode Psychotic Disorder Patients

Open access
Salvatore, Paola, Baldessarini, Ross J., Tohen, Mauricio, Khalsa, Hari-Mandir K., Sanchez-Toledo, Jesus Perez, Zarate, Carlos A., Vieta, Eduard, Maggini, Carlo·2009·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Since stability of DSM-IV diagnoses of disorders with psychotic features requires validation, we evaluated psychotic patients followed systematically in the McLean-Harvard International First Episode Project. METHOD: We diagnosed 517 patients hospitalized in a first psychotic illness by SCID-based criteria at baseline and at 24 months to assess stability of specific DSM-IV diagnoses. RESULTS: Among 500 patients (96.7%) completing the study, diagnoses remained stable in 77.6%, ranking as follows: bipolar I disorder (96.5%) > schizophrenia (75.0%) > delusional disorder (72.7%) > major depressive disorder (MDD), severe, with psychotic features (70.1%) > brief psychotic disorder (61.1%) > psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) (51.5%) >> schizophreniform disorder (10.5%). Most changed diagnoses (22.4% of patients) were to schizoaffective disorder (53.6% of changes in 12.0% of subjects, from psychotic disorder NOS > schizophrenia > schizophreniform disorder = bipolar I disorder most recent episode mixed, severe, with psychotic features > MDD, severe, with psychotic features > delusional disorder > brief psychotic disorder > bipolar I disorder most recent episode manic, severe, with psychotic features). Second most changed diagnoses were to bipolar I disorder (25.9% of changes, 5.8% of subjects, from MDD, severe, with psychotic features > psychotic disorder NOS > brief psychotic disorder > schizophreniform disorder). Third most changed diagnoses were to schizophrenia (12.5% of changes, 2.8% of subjects, from schizophreniform disorder > psychotic disorder NOS > brief psychotic disorder = delusional disorder = MDD, severe, with psychotic features). These 3 categories accounted for 92.0% of changes. By logistic regression, diagnostic change was associated with nonaffective psychosis > auditory hallucinations > youth > male sex > gradual onset. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia were more stable diagnoses than delusional disorder or MDD, severe, with psychotic features, and much more than brief psychotic disorder, psychotic disorder NOS, or schizophreniform disorder. Diagnostic changes mainly involved emergence of affective symptoms and were predicted by several premorbid factors. The findings have implications for revisions of DSM and ICD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.08m04227

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diagnosis in first-episode psychosis samples is somewhat fluid, with provisional diagnoses at intake, but most individuals receive schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses within the first year of treatment.

    “Diagnosis is somewhat fluid in these samples, with individuals often receiving provisional diagnoses at intake (Addington et al., 2006; Salvatore et al., 2009; Wright et al., 2019); however, these individuals typically receive schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses within the first year of treatment (Addington et al., 2006; Salvatore et al., 2009; Verma et al., 2012).”

    From Narrative identity in the psychosis spectrum: A systematic review and developmental model (2021) · cites this paper as Salvatore et al., 2009

    The Discussion (Predictive factors; page unavailable) describes initial provisional diagnoses and diagnostic instability, supporting the first part of the claim. The Results (Subject characteristics and initial diagnoses; page unavailable) report that 61.6% initially had affective-psychotic diagnoses, and the paper reports outcomes at two years, not a majority receiving schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses within the first year. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 155

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Kahlbaum KL Catatonia (1874) Levij Y Pridan T Baltimore, MD Johns Hopkins University Press 1973
  2. [4]American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth text revision (DSM-IV-TR) Arlington, VA American Psychiatric Press 2000
  3. [6]Baldessarini RJ American biological psychiatry and psychopharmacology 1944–1994 Menninger RW Nemiah JC American Psychiatry After World War II (1944–1994) Chapter 16 Washington, DC APA Press 2000 371 412
  4. [38]Kleist K On Karl Kleist Chapt 12 Hirsch SR Shepherd M Themes and Variations in European Psychiatry: An Anthology Marshal H Charlottesville, VA University of Virginia Press 1974 295 331
  5. [39]Leonhard K Classification of Endogenous Psychoses and their Differentiated Etiology Beckmann H 2nd New York Springer-Verlag 1999
  6. [40]Bonhoeffer K How far should all psychogenic illnesses be regarded as hysterical? In Hirsch SR, Shepherd M eds, translated by Marshal H Themes and Variations in European Psychiatry: An Anthology Charlottesville, VA University of Virginia Press 1974 53 64

Authors
Salvatore, P., Baldessarini, R. J., Tohen, M., Khalsa, H.-M. K., Sanchez-Toledo, J. P., Zarate, C. A., Vieta, E., & Maggini, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2008-12-30
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
458-466
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2414844690
Cited by
155
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k05mh047370-25, Z99 MH999999)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-73049, MH-10948, MH47370, MH-04844, R03MH073049)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, diagnostic stability, DSM-IV, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar I disorder, schizophrenia, delusional disorder, major depressive disorder with psychotic features, brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, diagnostic change, auditory hallucinations, premorbid factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Delusions, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, International Cooperation, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Severity of Illness Index, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review