Cited by 92Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Relapse Prevention in First-Episode Schizophrenia—Maintenance vs Intermittent Drug Treatment With Prodrome-Based Early Intervention: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia

Gaebel, Wolfgang, Riesbeck, Mathias, Wölwer, Wolfgang, Klimke, Ansgar, Eickhoff, Matthias, von Wilmsdorff, Martina, Lemke, Matthias, Heuser, Isabella +10 more·2011·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: After acute treatment of the first illness episode in schizophrenia, antipsychotic maintenance treatment is recommended for at least 1 year. Evidence for the optimal subsequent treatment is still scarce. Targeted intermittent treatment was found to be less effective than continuous treatment at preventing relapse in multiple episode patients; however, a post hoc analysis of our own data from a previous study suggested comparable efficacy of the 2 treatment approaches in first-episode patients. The current study was therefore designed to compare prospectively the relapse preventive efficacy of further maintenance treatment and targeted intermittent treatment in patients with ICD-10-diagnosed first-episode schizophrenia. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial was conducted within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia. Entry screening took place between November 2000 and May 2004. After 1 year of antipsychotic maintenance treatment, stable first-episode patients were randomly assigned to 12 months of further maintenance treatment or stepwise drug discontinuation and targeted intermittent treatment. In case of prodromal symptoms of an impending relapse, patients in both groups received early drug intervention, guided by a decision algorithm. The primary outcome measure was relapse (increase in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale positive score > 10, Clinical Global Impressions-Change score ≥ 6, and decrease in Global Assessment of Functioning score > 20 between 2 visits). RESULTS: Of 96 first-episode patients, only 44 were eligible for the assigned treatment (maintenance treatment, n = 23; intermittent treatment, n = 21). The rates of relapse (19% vs 0%; P = .04) and deterioration (up to 57% vs 4%; P < .001) were significantly higher in the intermittent treatment group than in the maintenance treatment group, but quality-of-life scores were comparable. Intermittent treatment patients received a significantly lower amount of antipsychotics (in haloperidol equivalents; P < .001) and tended to show fewer side effects, particularly extrapyramidal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance treatment is more effective than targeted intermittent treatment in preventing relapse, even in stable first-episode patients after 1 year of maintenance treatment, and should be the preferred treatment option. However, about 50% of patients remain stable at a significantly lower drug dose and show fewer side effects, and a substantial proportion refuse maintenance treatment. Alternative long-term treatment strategies, including targeted intermittent treatment, should therefore be provided in individual cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00159120.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.09m05459yel

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is likely that discontinuation studies employing linear dose reductions will be more likely to induce withdrawal reactions (including, potentially, withdrawal psychosis) because reductions in D2 antagonism become increasingly large, causing greater likelihood of dopaminergic rebound.

    “It is, therefore, likely that discontinuation studies employing linear dose reductions,74,83,84,86,87 as recommended in some older guidelines,94 will be more likely to induce withdrawal reactions (including, potentially, withdrawal psychosis) because reductions in D2 antagonism become increasingly large, causing greater likelihood of dopaminergic rebound.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaebel, W., Riesbeck, M., Wölwer, W., Klimke, A., Eickhoff, M., von Wilmsdorff, M., Lemke, M., Heuser, I., Maier, W., Huff, W., Schmitt, A., Sauer, H., Riedel, M., Klingberg, S., Köpcke, W., Ohmann, C., Möller, H.-J., & German Study Group on First-Episode Schizophrenia
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2010-06-29
Volume
72
Issue
02
Pages
205-218
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032982738
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
first-episode schizophrenia, relapse prevention, decision-making algorithm, extrapyramidal symptoms, quality of life, functional decline, treatment refusal
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Germany, Haloperidol, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Antipsychotic Agents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Risperidone, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review