Cited by 30Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Efficacy of Topiramate in the Treatment of Crack Cocaine Dependence: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Baldaçara, Leonardo, Cogo-Moreira, Hugo, Parreira, Bruna Leal, Diniz, Thaynne Almeida, Milhomem, Jaqueline Jerônimo, Fernandes, Camila Campitelli, Lacerda, Acioly Luiz Tavares·2016·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of topiramate in the treatment of crack cocaine dependence. Method Sixty men who were dependent on cocaine (DSM-IV) (exclusive use of crack cocaine) were selected. The subjects were randomly assigned to either a topiramate group (subjects received 50-200 mg of topiramate per day for 12 weeks) or a control group (subjects received placebo). The initial daily treatment dose was 50 mg, and this dose was increased weekly at increments of 25 to 50 mg, based on the subject's tolerability, to a maximum of 200 mg. All of the subjects also participated in motivational interviews and group therapy. The primary outcome measures were detection of benzoylecgonine in the urine, study retention, frequency of cocaine smoking, amount of cocaine use, and mean amount of money spent on cocaine per week. The study was conducted from February 2013 to February 2014. Results Twenty-nine subjects in the topiramate group and 29 subjects in the control group completed the study. Longitudinal assessment revealed that retention was not significant (odds ratio [OR] = 1.072, P = .908) between the 2 groups. Negative results from a urine test for benzoylecgonine (a cocaine metabolite), which is a measure of cocaine abstinence, were more frequently obtained from the topiramate group (OR = 8.687, P Conclusions The present findings indicate that topiramate is effective and safe and thus reinforce previous data sug…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.14m09377

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldaçara, L., Cogo-Moreira, H., Parreira, B. L., Diniz, T. A., Milhomem, J. J., Fernandes, C. C., & Lacerda, A. L. T.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Tocantins (BR)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2016-03-23
Volume
77
Issue
03
Pages
398-406
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2334938940
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
topiramate, crack cocaine dependence, cocaine dependence, pharmacotherapy, cocaine abstinence, benzoylecgonine, urine drug testing, student retention, motivational interviewing, group therapy, men, dose escalation, adverse effects, treatment discontinuation, relapse prevention, relapse prevention training
MeSH terms
Topiramate, Adult, Anticonvulsants, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Fructose, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Crack Cocaine, Treatment Outcome, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review