Cited by 60Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Clinical Outcome After Antipsychotic Treatment Discontinuation in Functionally Recovered First-Episode Nonaffective Psychosis Individuals: A 3-Year Naturalistic Follow-Up Study

Mayoral-van Son, Jacqueline, de la Foz, Victor Ortiz-Garcia, Martinez-Garcia, Obdulia, Moreno, Teresa, Parrilla-Escobar, Maria, Valdizan, Elsa M., Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto·2016·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The timing of antipsychotic discontinuation in patients who have fully recovered from their initial episode of psychosis is still open to discussion. We aimed to evaluate the risk of symptom recurrence during the 3 years after antipsychotic discontinuation in a sample of functionally recovered first-episode nonaffective psychosis (FEP) patients (DSM-IV criteria) with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. METHOD: Participants in this open-label, nonrandomized, prospective study were drawn from an ongoing longitudinal intervention program of FEP from a university hospital setting in Spain. From July 2004 to February 2011, functionally recovered FEP individuals were eligible if they met the inclusion criteria of (1) a minimum of 18 months on antipsychotic treatment, (2) clinical remission for at least 12 months, (3) functional recovery for at least 6 months, and (4) stabilization at the lowest effective doses for at least 3 months. Forty-six individuals who were willing to discontinue medication were included in the discontinuation group (target group). Twenty-two individuals opted to stay on the prescribed antipsychotic medication and therefore were included in the maintenance group (control group). Primary outcome measures were relapse rate at 18 and 36 months and time to relapse. RESULTS: The rates of relapse over the 3-year period were 67.4% (31 of 46) in the discontinuation group and 31.8% (7 of 22) in the maintenance group. The mean time to relapse was 209 (median = 122) days and 608 (median = 607) days, respectively (log rank = 10.106, P = .001). The resumption of antipsychotic medication after the relapse occurred was associated with clinical stability and lack of further relapses. When the overall group of relapsed individuals from the 2 conditions (N = 38) was compared to those who remained asymptomatic after 3 years (N = 30), there were significant differences (P < .05) in total scores on the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Clinical Global Impressions scale, and the Disability Assessment Schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic treatment discontinuation in individuals who had accomplished a functional recovery after a single psychotic episode was associated with a high risk of symptom recurrence. Relapsed individuals had a greater severity of symptoms and lower functional status after 3 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02220504.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.14m09540

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relapse rates are raised in the discontinuation group for 1-3 years following a switch to placebo, before converging with relapse rates of medicated patients thereafter.

    “It appears that relapse rates are raised in the discontinuation group for 1–3 years following a switch to placebo, before converging with relapse rates of medicated patients thereafter.3,56–59”
  • Relapses are not distributed evenly across time but tend to occur predominantly around the point of drug cessation.

    “That is, relapses are not distributed evenly across time but tend to occur predominantly around the point of drug cessation.”
  • In another study with more than 2 years follow-up, 56.5% of patients relapsed in the first year (41.3% in the first 6 months), 8.7% in the second year, and 2.2% per year thereafter.

    “the other found that 56.5% of patients relapsed in the first year (41.3% in the first 6 months), 8.7% in the second year, and 2.2% per year thereafter.58”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayoral-van Son, J., de la Foz, V. O.-G., Martinez-Garcia, O., Moreno, T., Parrilla-Escobar, M., Valdizan, E. M., & Crespo-Facorro, B.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2015-12-08
Volume
77
Issue
04
Pages
492-500
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295354447
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, non-affective psychosis, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, relapse risk, functional recovery, clinical remission, long-term antipsychotic treatment, negative symptoms, disability, time to relapse, relapse prevention, treatment planning
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Recurrence, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Antipsychotic Agents, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review