The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive Effects of MIN-101 in Patients With Schizophrenia and Negative Symptoms: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective Current dopamine-blocking antipsychotic drugs have little impact on the cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. We evaluated whether MIN-101, a molecule that combines sigma-2 antagonism and 5-HT2A antagonism, might improve cognitive deficits in individuals with moderate to severe negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Methods Individuals (N = 244) aged 18 to 60 years with stable symptoms of DSM-5-defined schizophrenia and moderate to severe negative symptoms were randomized to placebo (n = 83), MIN-101 32 mg (n = 78), or MIN-101 64 mg (n = 83) in a 12-week, phase 2b, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial between May 2015 and December 2015. In a post hoc analysis, mean z and T score changes from baseline at 12 weeks of treatment in the cognitive composite score and individual tests on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Battery were compared between MIN-101 and placebo. Results A total of 79 patients (95.2%) from the placebo group, 76 (97.4%) from the MIN-101 32 mg group, and 79 (95.2%) from the MIN-101 64 mg group completed the BACS at baseline. The BACS token motor (P = .04), verbal fluency (P = .01), and composite z scores (P = .05) showed significant improvements in the MIN-101 32 mg group compared to the placebo group. At week 4, the clinical improvements from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative factor showed a significant correlation with improvements from baseline on t…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a Phase 2b randomized controlled clinical trial, roluperidone exhibited promising therapeutic effects on cognitive function in individuals with schizophrenia.
“In a Phase 2b randomized controlled clinical trial, roluperidone exhibited promising therapeutic effects on cognitive function in individuals with schizophrenia [175].”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [175]
Citations
Cites
Keefe, R. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.011 · Cited by 1,573
Keefe, R. S. E., Fox, K. H., Harvey, P. D., Cucchiaro, J., Siu, C., & Loebel, A. (2011) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.09.015 · Cited by 237
Self-citationThe effects of guanfacine on context processing abnormalities in schizotypal personality disorder
McClure, M. M., Barch, D. M., Romero, M. J., Minzenberg, M. J., Triebwasser, J., Harvey, P. D., & Siever, L. J. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.034 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Structures of the σ2 receptor enable docking for bioactive ligand discovery
Alon, A., Lyu, J., Braz, J. M., Tummino, T. A., Craik, V., O’Meara, M. J., Webb, C. M., Radchenko, D. S., Moroz, Y. S., Huang, X.-P., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04175-x · Cited by 211
Lizama, B. N., Kahle, J., Catalano, S. M., Caggiano, A. O., Grundman, M., & Hamby, M. E. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076251 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Keefe, R. S. E., Harvey, P. D., Khan, A., Saoud, J. B., Staner, C., Davidson, M., & Luthringer, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2018-06-27
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0160-6689
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review