Cited by 9Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Wrestling With Antidepressant Use in Bipolar Disorder: The Ongoing Debate

Open access
Goldberg, Joseph F., Nierenberg, Andrew A., Iosifescu, Dan V.·2021·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.19ac13181

Cites

0 citation errors · 6 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transition from a diagnosis of MDD to one of bipolar disorder occurs at a rate of approximately 1-3% per year.

    “Furthermore, it is reported that the transition from a diagnosis of MDD to one of bipolar disorder occurs at a rate of approximately 1-­ 3% per year”

    From Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [159]

    The discussion of polarity switches in the ASCP Corner section concerns people already diagnosed with bipolar depression, not a change in diagnosis from MDD to bipolar disorder. Searches for an MDD-to-bipolar diagnostic transition and an annual rate of 1–3% found no passage addressing the claim; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sachs GS, Nierenberg AA, Calabrese JR, et al. Effectiveness of adjunctive antidepressant treatment for bipolar depression. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(17):1711-1722.
  2. Altshuler LL, Post RM, Hellemann G, et al. Impact of antidepressant continuation after acute positive or partial treatment response for bipolar depression: a blinded, randomized study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(4):450-457.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, J. F., Nierenberg, A. A., & Iosifescu, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Joseph F.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2021-01-19
Volume
82
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W3121457013
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
bipolar disorder, antidepressant use, antidepressant side effects, bipolar depression, mood stabilizers
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review