Cited by 18Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Considerations by Dutch Psychiatrists Regarding Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study

Open access
Pronk, Rosalie, Evenblij, Kirsten, Willems, Dick L., van de Vathorst, Suzanne·2019·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) in psychiatry are permitted in the Netherlands under certain legal conditions. Doctors may help patients who suffer unbearably and who have no prospect of improvement from psychiatric illnesses. Although this practice is permitted, it remains controversial, and the acceptability of EAS and the conditions under which it should be allowed are still debated. As the number of psychiatric patients requesting EAS is increasing, Dutch psychiatrists are becoming more reluctant to consider EAS. OBJECTIVE: This study aims for a better understanding of Dutch psychiatrists' considerations for supporting or rejecting EAS for psychiatric patients. METHODS: The data for this qualitative study were collected through 17 in-depth interviews with Dutch psychiatrists. These interviews were held from January until June 2016 as a part of the Third Evaluation of the Dutch Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Act. RESULTS: Irrespective of their own position in the debate, most Dutch psychiatrists consider reasons for and against EAS, including moral (justice and equality, professional responsibility, compassion), epistemologic (how can one ever know the suffering is without prospect), practical, and contextual (mental health care provisions) reasons. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in views on EAS in psychiatry seems to be related to a difference in views on the nature of psychiatric diseases. Some psychiatrists stress the similarity between psychiatric and somatic diseases, whereas others stress the fundamental difference. These opposing views could be bridged by a pragmatic view, such as a 2-track approach to EAS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.19m12736

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pronk, R., Evenblij, K., Willems, D. L., & van de Vathorst, S.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2019-11-05
Volume
80
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W2987658588
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers
  • ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, psychiatrists' attitudes, psychiatric patients, moral considerations, professional responsibility, compassion, mental health service delivery
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Euthanasia, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Netherlands, Psychiatry, Suicide, Assisted, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review