Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 37Treatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epidemiology of Treatment-Resistant Depression in the United States

Liu, Xinyue, Mukai, Yuki, Furtek, Christine I., Bortnichak, Edward A., Liaw, Kai-Li, Zhong, Wenjun·2021·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

The prevalence of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) among patients with pharmaceutically treated depression (PTD) varies greatly in publications. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of TRD using 2 large claims databases in the US. codes: F32.xx, F33.xx) and 1 antidepressant prescription filled in 2018 were identified as having PTD. Among patients with PTD, TRD was defined as experiencing failure of treatment with at least 2 antidepressants with ≥ 4 weeks of adequate treatment. We estimated the age- and gender-standardized prevalence of TRD and then used logistic regression to investigate if TRD risk varies by age, sex, race, and geographic region. Finally, we described the timeline of TRD development in incident PTD patients. We identified 296,055 and 277,941 patients with PTD in the Humana and Optum databases, among whom 17,640 (6.0%) and 16,131 (5.8%) had TRD. After age and sex standardization, TRD prevalence among PTD patients was 6.8% in Humana vs 5.8% in Optum. Females, middle-aged adults, and White patients had higher risk of TRD. The median time from index antidepressant use to TRD was about 6 months in incident PTD patients. The prevalence of TRD among patients with PTD was similar in the 2 databases. TRD prevalence varies by sex, race, and age, with a higher prevalence in females, White patients, and those in the age group of 45-64 years. However, the absolute differences were small.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.21m13964

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Mukai, Y., Furtek, C. I., Bortnichak, E. A., Liaw, K.-L., & Zhong, W.
Affiliations
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2021-11-30
Volume
83
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W3215685141
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression, prevalence, antidepressant treatment failure, antidepressant prescribing, sex differences, racial differences, age differences, regional variation, claims data
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Prevalence, Databases, Factual, Young Adult, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.