The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Residual Symptoms in Depressed Patients Who Respond Acutely to Fluoxetine
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antidepressants have unequivocal efficacy as compared with placebo, but many patients have residual symptoms despite a robust response to antidepressant therapy. The purpose of this study is to assess residual symptoms in outpatients who respond acutely to fluoxetine. METHOD: Two hundred and fifteen outpatients with major depressive disorder as assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID-P) were treated openly with fluoxetine 20 mg/day for 8 weeks. One hundred and eight (50.2%) were considered full responders (final 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] score < or =7). Percentages of full responders who continued to have subthreshold or full major depressive disorder symptoms were calculated. The relationship between residual symptoms and Axis I and Axis II (assessed with SCID-II for personality disorders) comorbidity was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 108 responders, 19 (17.6%) had no subthreshold or threshold SCID-P major depressive disorder symptoms, while 28 (25.9%) had 1 symptom, and 61 (56.5%) had 2 or more symptoms. No statistically significant relationships were found between number of residual symptoms and selected Axis I comorbid conditions or total number of Axis II disorders. CONCLUSION: Less than 20% of full responders to fluoxetine by HAM-D criteria were free of all SCID-P subthreshold and threshold major depressive disorder symptoms after 8 weeks of treatment. While depressed patients benefit from antidepressants, most continue to have some symptoms of depression. The high prevalence of residual symptoms among antidepressant responders suggests the need for further study including whether residual symptoms abate with longer treatment or increased dose of fluoxetine. Other strategies, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, may be needed to address residual symptoms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Longitudinal studies suggest that insomnia increases the risk of developing a psychiatric condition [6,40,41]; these studies also suggest that the treatment of the psychiatric condition does not necessarily resolve disturbed sleep [42,43].”
From Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Insomnia (2012) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trivedi, M. H., Rush, A. J., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Warden, D., Ritz, L., Norquist, G., Howland, R. H., Lebowitz, B., McGrath, P. J., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28 · Cited by 3,879
Self-citationFatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses: Proposal for a unified taxonomy
Kluger, B. M., Krupp, L. B., & Enoka, R. M. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31827f07be · Cited by 1,036
“Even among patients with major depressive disorder, many report continued fatigue after successful treatment of their depressed mood.(47) From a research perspective, distinguishing fatigue from related phenomena can be accomplished by including measures of mood and sleepiness as covariates.”
BackgroundMorin, C. M., & Benca, R. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60750-2 · Cited by 976
Morin, C. M., & Jarrin, D. C. (2022) · Sleep Medicine Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.jsmc.2022.03.003 · Cited by 907
Manber, R., Edinger, J. D., Gress, J. L., Pedro-Salcedo, M. G. S., Kuo, T. F., & Kalista, T. (2008) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/31.4.489 · Cited by 868
Metadata
- Authors
- Nierenberg, A. A., Keefe, B. R., Leslie, V. C., Alpert, J. E., Pava, J. A., Worthington, J. J., Rosenbaum, J. F., & Fava, M.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 1999-04-15
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-225
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056454671
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r01mh048483-01a1)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH48483-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- residual depressive symptoms, fluoxetine, major depressive disorder, antidepressant response, subthreshold depression, comorbidities, personality disorders, outpatients, cognitive behavioral therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Ambulatory Care, Depressive Disorder, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Age of Onset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review