CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Combined Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Fluoxetine in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder

Simpson, Elizabeth B., Yen, Shirley, Costello, Ellen, Rosen, Karen, Begin, Ann, Pistorello, Jacqueline, Pearlstein, Teri·2004·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
DOI 10.4088/jcp.v65n0314
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examines the therapeutic effect of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, added to dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), an empirically supported psychosocial therapy, for the treatment of borderline personality disorder. METHOD: This is a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of patients with borderline personality disorder (identified using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders). All subjects received individual and group DBT. Of the 20 subjects that completed treatment, 9 were randomly assigned to receive up to 40 mg/day of fluoxetine and 11 were randomly assigned to the placebo condition. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and at week 10 or 11 on self-report measures of depression, anxiety, anger expression, dissociation, and global functioning. The study was conducted between January 1998 and February 2000. RESULTS: Time-by-group interaction effects revealed no significant group differences in scores from pre-treatment to posttreatment on any measure. However, within the DBT/placebo group, there were significant pretreatment/posttreatment differences in the direction of improvement on all measures. No significant pre-treatment/posttreatment differences were found within the DBT/fluoxetine condition. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that adding fluoxetine to an efficacious psychosocial treatment does not provide any additional benefits. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v65n0314

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Simpson, E. B., Yen, S., Costello, E., Rosen, K., Begin, A., Pistorello, J., & Pearlstein, T.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Publisher
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
Published
2004-03-15
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
379-385
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.4088/jcp.v65n0314
OpenAlex
W2025624676
Cited by
156
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, dialectical behavior therapy, fluoxetine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, psychosocial interventions, depression, anxiety, anger expression, dissociation, global functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Combined Modality Therapy, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review