Cited by 166Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dialectical behavior therapy for clients with binge‐eating disorder or bulimia nervosa and borderline personality disorder

Chen, Eunice Y., Matthews, Lauren, Allen, Charese, Kuo, Janice R., Linehan, Marsha Marie·2008·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: This treatment development study provides summary data for standard Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) with minimal adaptation for 8 women with binge‐eating disorder (BED) (5) or bulimia nervosa (BN) (3) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Method: DBT involved 6 months of weekly skills group, individual DBT, therapist consultation team meeting, and 24‐hour telephone coaching. Assessments were conducted at pre‐, post‐treatment, and 6‐months follow‐up and utilized standardized clinical interviews including the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE), Personality Disorders Exam, and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV. Results: From pre‐ to post‐treatment, effect sizes for objective binge eating, total EDE scores and global adjustment were large and for number of non‐eating disorder axis I disorders and for suicidal behavior and self‐injury were medium. From pre‐ to 6‐months follow‐up, effect sizes were large for all these outcomes. Conclusion: This provides promising pilot data for larger studies utilizing DBT for BED or BN and BPD. © 2008 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2008

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.20522

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, E. Y., Matthews, L., Allen, C., Kuo, J. R., & Linehan, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Eunice Y.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-17
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
505-512
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2070073338
Cited by
166
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH081030)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, borderline personality disorder, eating disorders, suicidal behavior, self-harm, treatment development, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Demography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Retention, Psychology, Suicide, Attempted, Bulimia Nervosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review