The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Medication Adherence and Long-Term Functional Outcomes in the Treatment of Schizophrenia in Usual Care
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the relationships between medication adherence and long-term functional outcomes in the treatment of schizophrenia. To extend previous research, we prospectively examined the relationships between adherence with any antipsychotic medication and functional outcomes among schizophrenia patients treated over a 3-year period, assessed the stability of adherence over time, and examined whether adherence in the first year predicts changes in functional outcomes over the following 2 years. METHOD: Analyses included 1906 participants with DSM-IV diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective or schizophreniform disorder in a multi-site, 3-year, prospective, naturalistic study conducted in the United States between July 1997 and September 2003. Outcome measures were assessed at 6-month intervals using systematic medical record abstraction and structured interview of patients. Adherence with antipsychotic regimen was assessed using patient-reported adherence and the medication possession ratio (percent days with prescription for any antipsychotic), dichotomized into adherence and non-adherence. Analyses employed generalized estimating equations and mixed models with repeated measures. RESULTS: Nonadherence was associated with poorer functional outcomes, including greater risks of psychiatric hospitalizations, use of emergency psychiatric services, arrests, violence, victimizations, poorer mental functioning, poorer life satisfaction, greater substance use, and more alcohol-related problems (all p < .001). Adherence was relatively stable, with 77.3% of patients maintaining the same adherence status from the first year to the second year. Nonadherence in the first year predicted significantly poorer outcomes in the following 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the importance of adherence with antipsychotic medication in the long-term treatment of schizophrenia and its potential beneficial impact on the mental health and criminal justice delivery systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Velligan, D. I., Sajatovic, M., Hatch, A., Kramata, P., & Docherty, J. (2017) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s124658 · Cited by 333
Martin, B. C., Wiley-Exley, E. K., Richards, S., Domino, M. E., Carey, T. S., & Sleath, B. L. (2009) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1345/aph.1k671 · Cited by 226
Schizophrenia--Time to Commit to Policy Change
Fleischhacker, W. W., Arango, C., Arteel, P., Barnes, T. R. E., Carpenter, W., Duckworth, K., Galderisi, S., Halpern, L., Knapp, M., Marder, S. R., et al. (2014) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu006 · Cited by 214
Kaplan, G., Casoy, J., & Zummo, J. (2013) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s53795 · Cited by 201
Samtani, M. N., Vermeulen, A., & Stuyckens, K. (2009) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11316870-000000000-00000 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Ascher-Svanum, H., Faries, D. E., Zhu, B., Ernst, F. R., Swartz, M. S., & Swanson, J. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2006-03-15
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 453-460
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009652756
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medication Adherence and Long-Term Functional Outcomes in the Treatment of Schizophrenia in Usual Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.v67n0317
- The paper
- Ascher-Svanum, H., Faries, D. E., Zhu, B., Ernst, F. R., Swartz, M. S., & Swanson, J. W. (2006). Medication Adherence and Long-Term Functional Outcomes in the Treatment of Schizophrenia in Usual Care. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v67n0317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.