Cited by 196Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major Depression

Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Mania: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

Perlis, Roy H., Welge, Jeffrey A., Vornik, Lana A., Hirschfeld, Robert M. A., Keck, Paul E.·2006·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy for atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of mania in bipolar disorder, either as monotherapy or adjunctive treatment. However, there are no published comparisons of individual atypical antipsychotics for mania. Data sources and study selection We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled monotherapy and adjunctive therapy trials of atypical antipsychotics for acute bipolar mania. Studies published through 2004 were identified using searches of PubMed/MEDLINE with the search terms mania, placebo, and each of the atypical antipsychotics, limited to randomized, controlled clinical trials; review of abstracts from the 2003 meetings of the American College of Neuropsychiatry, American Psychiatric Association, and International Conference on Bipolar Disorder; and consultations with study investigators and representatives of pharmaceutical companies that market atypical antipsychotics. Data extraction Analyses were performed on the changes in Young Mania Rating Scale or Mania Rating Scale total scores from baseline to endpoint, using last observation carried forward and computing the difference in change scores between each drug and its corresponding placebo arm. A random-effects model with fixed drug effects was used to combine the studies and make comparisons of the antipsychotics to each other and to placebo. Data synthesis Data from 12 placebo-controlled monotherapy an…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v67n0401

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining atypical antipsychotics and mood stabilizers is the most efficacious treatment in acute mania.

    “Currently available data suggest that combining atypical antipsychotics and mood stabilizers is the most efficacious treatment in acute mania, reinforced after a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled data conducted by Perlis and Scherk”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perlis, R. H., Welge, J. A., Vornik, L. A., Hirschfeld, R. M. A., & Keck, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2006-04-15
Volume
67
Issue
04
Pages
509-516
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004264470
Cited by
196
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH067060)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
atypical antipsychotics, bipolar mania, bipolar disorder, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, monotherapy, adjunctive therapy, antipsychotic efficacy, Young Mania Rating Scale, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Antipsychotic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review