Lithium Augmentation Compared With Phenelzine in Treatment-Resistant Depression in the Elderly: An Open, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Up to a third of elderly patients with major depressive disorder do not respond to a first course of treatment with an antidepressant. There is a lack of controlled studies evaluating therapies for treatment-resistant depression in late-life depression, and no randomized controlled studies assessing the efficacy and tolerability of lithium augmentation in elderly patients have been published. METHOD: Twenty-nine elderly inpatients with major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV criteria who had previously failed to respond to 1 or more adequate trials with a tricyclic antidepressant or venlafaxine were included in a 6-week, open, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up. Subjects received either lithium augmentation or the monoamine oxidase inhibitor phenelzine. The primary outcome criterion was remission, defined as a final score of less than or equal to 10 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Response was defined as at least 50% reduction on the MADRS or the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects completed the trial. Remission on the MADRS was achieved by 33.3% of the lithium patients, compared with none of the phenelzine patients (p = .042). Response also showed a difference in favor of lithium augmentation (p = .035 on both the MADRS and the HAM-D). Overall tolerability was good, with no dropouts due to side effects. Subjective memory impairment was more prevalent among patients receiving phenelzine (p = .002), and tremors were significantly more prevalent among patients receiving lithium (p = .002). During the 2-year follow-up, 25 patients (86.2%) did achieve remission, particularly on prolonging the lithium treatment (5 patients) or on lithium augmentation to phenelzine (5 patients). CONCLUSION: Lithium was more effective than phenelzine in elderly patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, while tolerance of both treatments was remarkably good in this group of elderly inpatients with many comorbid medical disorders. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Controlled-trials.com identifier is RCTN93105957.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some included reports described drug effects in words but did not substantiate them with specific data.
“drug effects described in words but not substantiated with specific data.46,48-50”
From Cognitive Effects of Pharmacotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cleare, A., Pariante, C., Young, A., Anderson, I., Christmas, D., Cowen, P., Dickens, C., Ferrier, I., Geddes, J., Gilbody, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881115581093 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Treatments for Refractory Depression in Older People
Cooper, C., Katona, C., Lyketsos, K., Blazer, D., Brodaty, H., Rabins, P., de Mendonça Lima, C. A., & Livingston, G. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10081165 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Blumberger, D. M., Mulsant, B. H., Fitzgerald, P. B., Rajji, T. K., Ravindran, A. V., Young, L. T., Levinson, A. J., & Daskalakis, Z. J. (2012) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/15622975.2011.579163 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Cognitive Effects of Pharmacotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review
Keefe, R. S. E., McClintock, S. M., Roth, R. M., Doraiswamy, P. M., Tiger, S., & Madhoo, M. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.13r08609 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Cristancho, P., Lenard, E., Lenze, E. J., Miller, J. P., Brown, P. J., Roose, S. P., Montes-Garcia, C., Blumberger, D. M., Mulsant, B. H., Lavretsky, H., et al. (2019) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2019.04.005 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Baba, H., Kito, S., Nukariya, K., Takeshima, M., Fujise, N., Iga, J., Oshibuchi, H., Kawano, M., Kimura, M., Mizukami, K., et al. (2022) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13349 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kok, R. M., Vink, D., Heeren, T. J., & Nolen, W. A.
- Affiliations
- Altrecht GGZ (NL)
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2007-08-15
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 1177-1185
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098500336
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- lithium augmentation, phenelzine, treatment-resistant depression, geriatric depression, elderly patients, major depressive disorder, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, antidepressant response, remission, subjective memory impairment, tremor, tolerability
- MeSH terms
- Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Cyclohexanols, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Resistance, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phenelzine, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Treatment Outcome, Lithium Compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review