Cited by 179Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Why Don't Psychiatrists Use Scales to Measure Outcome When Treating Depressed Patients?

Zimmerman, Mark, McGlinchey, Joseph B.·2008·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A survey of psychiatrists in the United Kingdom found that only a minority routinely used standardized measures to assess outcome when treating depression and anxiety disorders. The goals of the present study were to determine how frequently psychiatrists in the United States use scales to measure outcome when treating depressed patients and, for those clinicians who do not regularly use such scales, to ascertain the reasons for the lack of use. METHOD: The subjects were 314 psychiatrists who attended a continuing medical education conference in California, Massachusetts, New York, or Wisconsin in 2006 or 2007. Prior to a lecture, the subjects completed a questionnaire that included 2 questions regarding the use of rating scales to monitor outcome when treating depression. RESULTS: More than 80% of the psychiatrists indicated that they did not routinely use scales to monitor outcome when treating depression. The most frequent reasons psychiatrists gave for not using scales were that they did not believe scales would be clinically helpful, that scales take too much time to use, and that they were not trained in the use of such measures. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of psychiatrists indicated that they do not routinely use standardized measures to evaluate outcome when treating depressed patients. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Physician Quality Reporting Initiative is intended to improve quality of care by providing physicians financial incentives to document outcomes reflecting best practices. If standardized outcome assessment is to assume increasing importance in this country, either educational efforts or payor mandates, or both, will be necessary to change clinicians' behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v69n1209

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These measurement-based care programs do not reach all patients with mental disorders, and most health care providers do not routinely apply measurement-based care.

    “However, these programs do not reach all patients with mental disorders, and a majority of health care providers do not routinely apply measurement-based care 48,49 .”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmerman, M., & McGlinchey, J. B.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2008-12-31
Volume
69
Issue
12
Pages
1916-1919
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092574656
Cited by
179
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, outcome measurement, rating scales, psychiatrists, clinician behavior, Physician Quality Reporting Initiative, quality of care, continuing medical education, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Attitude of Health Personnel, Depressive Disorder, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychiatry, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review