Cited by 13Pharmacy and Medical PracticesPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsMedication Adherence and Compliance

Actual Versus Expected Doses of Half Tablets Containing Prescribed Psychoactive Substances: A Systematic Review

Eserian, Jaqueline K., Lombardo, Márcia, Chagas, Jair R., Galduróz, José C. F.·2018·The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders

Abstract

Objective To assess through a systematic review of the literature if the practice of splitting tablets containing psychoactive/psychotropic medications for medical or economic reasons would result in the expected doses. Data sources A MEDLINE and PsycInfo comprehensive search of English-language publications from January 1999 to December 2015 was conducted using the terms describing tablet splitting (tablet splitting, split tablets, tablet subdivision, divided tablets, and half tablets) and psychoactive substances (psychoactive medicines, psychotropic medicines, antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, and antiparkinsonian agents). An additional supplementary search included the references from the articles found. Study selection/data extraction Studies were included if splitting content was directly related to psychoactive medications and examined the effect of tablet splitting on drug uniformity, weight uniformity, and adherence of psychoactive drugs. Articles were systematically reviewed and examined regarding the study design, methodology, and results of the study. A total of 125 articles were screened, and 13 were selected. Results Tablet splitting implications are extensive, yet substantial deviations from the ideal weight, potency, and dose uniformity are more prone to be important to patient safety. The uneven division of tablets might result in the administration of different doses than what was prescribed, causing under- or overdosing, which mi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/pcc.17r02211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eserian, J. K., Lombardo, M., Chagas, J. R., & Galduróz, J. C. F.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Adolfo Lutz (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Galduróz, José C. F.
Venue
The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders
Published
2018-02-08
Volume
20
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2155-7772 (ISSN-L)
  • 2155-7780
OpenAlex
W2788530542
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
tablet splitting, psychoactive substances, psychotropic drugs, dose accuracy, dose homogeneity, weight uniformity, medication adherence, underdosing, drug overdose, patient safety, antidepressants, anxiolytics, antiepileptic drugs, antipsychotic drugs, antiparkinsonian drugs
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychotropic Drugs, Tablets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review