Cited by 15Treatment of Major DepressionPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Current strategies for tapering psychiatric drugs: Differing recommendations, impractical doses, and other barriers

Eserian, Jaqueline Kalleian, Blanco, Vinícius Paccola, Mercuri, Lucildes Pita, Matos, Jivaldo do Rosario, Galduróz, José Carlos Fernandes·2023·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

While effective ways to prevent withdrawal symptoms from psychiatric drugs remain unclear, a highly accepted clinical approach for treatment discontinuation is to gradually reduce doses over time. The objective of this review is to gather the current strategies for tapering of psychiatric drugs described in the literature and guidelines in an attempt to identify the most promising one. Literature review and search for practice guidelines provided by government agencies and medical organizations were performed. Different strategies for tapering were found: linear tapering, hyperbolic tapering (by exponential dose reduction and pre-established dose-response curves), extended dosing, and substitution for a long half-life drug. The use of guidelines offers support for patients and prescribers, increasing the likelihood of achieving effective drug discontinuation. Nevertheless, the lack of standardization found among the guidelines makes any attempt to reduce or stop the drug very difficult for prescribers. Hyperbolic tapering by exponential dose reduction appears to be the most promising strategy for psychiatric drug discontinuation. Yet, we still face a constant challenge: how to safely obtain flexible doses for the discontinuation of drugs, particularly during the last steps in which lower doses are required. Further studies are needed to reduce the barriers associated with psychiatric drug discontinuation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115537

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent systematic review concluded that hyperbolic tapering appears to be the most promising strategy for psychiatric drug discontinuation.

    “Consistent with this, a recent systematic review of tapering strategies for psychiatric drugs, including benzodiazepines, concluded that ‘hyperbolic tapering…appears to be the most promising strategy for psychiatric drug discontinuation’ (Eserian et al., 2023).”

    From Pharmacological principles for safe benzodiazepine and Z-drug dose reduction (2026) · cites this paper as Eserian et al., 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eserian, J. K., Blanco, V. P., Mercuri, L. P., Matos, J. D. R., & Galduróz, J. C. F.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Adolfo Lutz (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Eserian, Jaqueline Kalleian
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
329
Pages
115537
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387447026
Cited by
15
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
treatment discontinuation, extended dosing, drug substitution, withdrawal symptoms, dose-response curves, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants
MeSH terms
Humans, Remission Induction, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review