Cited by 4Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologySchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relationships Between Executive Function Improvement and ADHD Symptom Improvement With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Adults With ADHD and Executive Function Deficits

Brown, Thomas E., Chen, Jie, Robertson, Brigitte·2020·The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Executive function (EF) deficits are not generally considered synonymous with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Evidence suggests stimulants improve ADHD symptoms and EF deficits in adults with ADHD, but the relationships between improvements in these domains have not been studied. METHODS: These post hoc analyses used data from a 10-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adults with ADHD and EF deficits treated with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (30-70 mg) or placebo conducted from May 2010 to November 2010. Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline at week 10/early termination (ET) in self-report Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Global Executive Composite (GEC) T-score and ADHD-Rating Scale with Adult Prompts total score (ADHD-RS-AP-TS). Relationships between ADHD symptom and EF changes were examined using recursive path analyses. RESULTS: Mediation proportions were 0.62 (indirect and total treatment effect coefficients [95% CI]: -6.85 [-9.83 to -3.86] and -11.12 [-14.88 to -7.37]) for self-report BRIEF-A GEC T-score change from baseline at week 10/ET on ADHD-RS-AP-TS change from baseline at week 10/ET and 0.93 (indirect and total treatment effect coefficients [95% CI]: -10.34 [-14.11 to -6.57] and -11.18 [-15.80 to -6.55]) for ADHD-RS-AP-TS change from baseline at week 10/ET on self-report BRIEF-A GEC T-score change from baseline at week 10/ET. CONCLUSIONS: Although these data suggest ADHD symptom and EF deficit improvement following lisdexamfetamine are interdependent, it is advantageous to use measures like the BRIEF-A to assess stimulant effects on the wide range of EF deficits associated with ADHD that are not captured by the ADHD-RS-AP alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Data used in this secondary analysis came from ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01101022.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/pcc.19m02559

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brown, T. E., Chen, J., & Robertson, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Thomas E.
Venue
The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders
Published
2020-05-28
Volume
22
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 2155-7772 (ISSN-L)
  • 2155-7780
OpenAlex
W3031999107
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, adult ADHD, executive dysfunction, stimulant medication, ADHD symptom improvement, BRIEF-A, executive function assessment
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review