Cited by 63Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

A Smartphone Application Significantly Improved Diabetes Self-Care Activities with High User Satisfaction

Open access
Kim, Yu Jin, Rhee, Sang Youl, Byun, Jong Kyu, Park, So Young, Hong, Soo Min, Chin, Sang Ouk, Chon, Suk, Oh, Seungjoon +3 more·2015·Diabetes & Metabolism Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We developed for the first time a smartphone application designed for diabetes self-management in Korea and registered a patent for the relevant algorithm. We also investigated the user satisfaction with the application and the change in diabetes related self-care activities after using the application. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey on volunteers with diabetes who were using the application. Ninety subjects responded to the questionnaire between June 2012 and March 2013. A modified version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used in this study. RESULTS: The survey results exhibited a mean subject age of 44.0 years old, and males accounted for 78.9% of the subjects. Fifty percent of the subjects had diabetes for less than 3 years. The majority of respondents experienced positive changes in their clinical course after using the application (83.1%) and were satisfied with the structure and completeness of the application (86.7%). Additionally, the respondents' answers indicated that the application was easy to use (96.7%) and recommendable to others (97.7%) and that they would continue using the application to manage their diabetes (96.7%). After using the Diabetes Notepad application, diabetes related self-care activities assessed by SDSCA displayed statistically significant improvements (P<0.05), except for the number of days of drinking. CONCLUSION: This smartphone-based application can be a useful tool leading to positive changes in diabetes related self-care activities and increase user satisfaction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4093/dmj.2015.39.3.207

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The remaining 4 papers did not specify the type of DM or included a mix of DM types, with 256 patients in the intervention groups and 124 in the control groups.

    “The remaining 4 papers did not specify the type of DM they looked at or included a mix of DM types (256 patients in the intervention groups and 124 patients in the control groups) [66-69].”
  • Kim et al reported significant improvements on the SDSCA diet scale (0.73, P<.05).

    “Kim et al [69] (90 patients in the intervention group) reported significant improvements through the intervention regarding the total SDSCA score (P<.05), as well as on the scales for diet (0.73, P<.05), exercise (1.11, P<.05), blood sugar testing (1.93, P<.05), and smoking (–0.51, P<.05).”
  • Kim et al reported significant improvements on the SDSCA exercise scale (1.11, P<.05).

    “Kim et al [69] (90 patients in the intervention group) reported significant improvements through the intervention regarding the total SDSCA score (P<.05), as well as on the scales for diet (0.73, P<.05), exercise (1.11, P<.05), blood sugar testing (1.93, P<.05), and smoking (–0.51, P<.05).”
  • Kim et al reported significant improvements on the SDSCA blood sugar testing scale (1.93, P<.05).

    “Kim et al [69] (90 patients in the intervention group) reported significant improvements through the intervention regarding the total SDSCA score (P<.05), as well as on the scales for diet (0.73, P<.05), exercise (1.11, P<.05), blood sugar testing (1.93, P<.05), and smoking (–0.51, P<.05).”
  • Kim et al (90 intervention) reported significant improvements through the intervention regarding the total SDSCA score (P<.05).

    “Kim et al [69] (90 patients in the intervention group) reported significant improvements through the intervention regarding the total SDSCA score (P<.05), as well as on the scales for diet (0.73, P<.05), exercise (1.11, P<.05), blood sugar testing (1.93, P<.05), and smoking (–0.51, P<.05).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y. J., Rhee, S. Y., Byun, J. K., Park, S. Y., Hong, S. M., Chin, S. O., Chon, S., Oh, S., Woo, J.-T., Kim, S. W., & Kim, Y. S.
Affiliations
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
  • Jeju National University Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Rhee, Sang Youl
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Published
2015
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
207
ISSN
  • 2233-6079 (ISSN-L)
  • 2233-6087
OpenAlex
W1489140046
Cited by
63
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
14.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes & Metabolism Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI10C2020)
  • Korean Diabetes Association (SYR, 2009, 2010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes self-management, mobile application, diabetes self-care activities, user satisfaction, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities, diabetes self-monitoring, mobile health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review