Cited by 29HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment

Clinician perceptions and patient experiences of antiretroviral treatment integration in primary health care clinics, Tshwane, South Africa

Open access
Mathibe, Maphuthego D., Hendricks, Stephen J.H., Bergh, Anne-Marie·2015·Curationis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary Health Care (PHC) clinicians and patients are major role players in the South African antiretroviral treatment programme. Understanding their perceptions and experiences of integrated care and the management of people living with HIV and AIDS in PHC facilities is necessary for successful implementation and sustainability of integration. OBJECTIVE: This study explored clinician perceptions and patient experiences of integration of antiretroviral treatment in PHC clinics. METHOD: An exploratory, qualitative study was conducted in four city of Tshwane PHC facilities. Two urban and two rural facilities following different models of integration were included. A self-administered questionnaire with open-ended items was completed by 35 clinicians and four focus group interviews were conducted with HIV-positive patients. The data were coded and categories were grouped into sub-themes and themes. RESULTS: Workload, staff development and support for integration affected clinicians' performance and viewpoints. They perceived promotion of privacy, reduced discrimination and increased access to comprehensive care as benefits of service integration. Delays, poor patient care and patient dissatisfaction were viewed as negative aspects of integration. In three facilities patients were satisfied with integration or semi-integration and felt common queues prevented stigma and discrimination, whilst the reverse was true in the facility with separate services. Single-month issuance of antiretroviral drugs and clinic schedule organisation was viewed negatively, as well as poor staff attitudes, poor communication and long waiting times. CONCLUSION: Although a fully integrated service model is preferable, aspects that need further attention are management support from health authorities for health facilities, improved working conditions and appropriate staff development opportunities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1489

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two important studies in South Africa found that integrated care, in particular shared waiting rooms for all people with chronic conditions, was reported by staff to reduce discrimination and to increase access to care among people with HIV/AIDS.

    “Two important studies in South Africa found that integrated care, in particular shared waiting rooms for all people with chronic conditions, was reported by staff to reduce discrimination and to increase access to care among people with HIV/AIDS 71,72 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Conradie F., 2014, ‘ Message from the president’, HIV Nursing Matters 5(1), 6.
  2. Gonzalez L.L., 2013, ‘ Trailblazing move to take HIV treatment out of clinics’, HIV Nursing Matters 5(1), 10– 11.
  3. Landman W.A., 2011, ‘ The ethics of responsibility and accountability in nursing’, HIV Nursing Matters 2(2), 20– 23.
  4. Mabitsi M.L., 2013, ‘ TB/HIV integration at primary healthcare facilities: Experiences from Soweto’, HIV Nursing Matters 5(1), 12– 15.
  5. Mukone D., Charumbira A.P.G., Nyamakura R., Zvinavashe M. & Manwere A., 2011, ‘ ART knowledge and adherence’, HIV Nursing Matters 2(2), 16– 19.
  6. Smit L., Diergaardt C., Fourie S., Matshikwe N. & Letsoalo M., 2011, ‘ Nurses HIV and paediatrics’, HIV Nursing Matters 2(3), 10– 13.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathibe, M. D., Hendricks, S. J. H., & Bergh, A.-M.
Affiliations
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mathibe, Maphuthego D.
Venue
Curationis
Publisher
AOSIS
Published
2015-02-27
Volume
38
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0379-8577 (ISSN-L)
  • 2223-6279
OpenAlex
W1873755541
Cited by
29
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Curationis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Keywords
primary care, HIV care, clinician perceptions, patient experience, workload, employee development, stigma and discrimination, waiting time, patient satisfaction, Tshwane
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, South Africa, HIV Infections, Patient Satisfaction, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review