Cited by 47Occupational and environmental lung diseasesInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisIndustrial and Mining Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomarkers: A potential prognostic tool for silicosis

Open access
Pandey, JaiKrishna, Agarwal, Deepa·2012·Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

Long-term exposure to respirable dust containing silica leads to pneumoconiosis/silicosis. The disease is irreversible and incurable, and only preventive steps such as job rotation, use of personal protective equipment, etc., remain solutions to the problem. Under such a situation, early diagnosis or prediction may become very useful to control the disease. Biomarkers are biological parameters in blood serum that change their values with deposition of dust in the lung and onset of lung fibrosis. Since these biomarkers can help us to diagnose and in the prognosis of the disease before it is actually diagnosed by the conventional X-ray technique and lung function test used for diagnosis of silicosis. The present paper describes the various types of available biomarkers, their application and usefulness. The paper also suggests that further study of the behavior/level of these biomarkers on a specific subject with time may provide more useful information of a confirmatory nature for prevention of dust-linked diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0019-5278.111746

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nonspecific serum markers of inflammation and tumor biomarkers might have utility in screening and/or trending levels of disease severity, though they would help little in ascertaining the diagnosis or determining the level of functional impairment.

    “Nonspecific serum markers of inflammation and tumor biomarkers might have utility in screening and/or trending levels of disease severity, though they would help little in ascertaining the diagnosis or determining the level of functional impairment68,69.”

    From Overview of lunar dust toxicity risk (2022) · cites this paper as [69]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bai, 1993, Changes of trace element copper and zinc in sera of cases with silicosis, Chin J Indian Hyg Occup Dis, 280
  2. Konishi, 1985, Changes of trace element copper and zinc in sera of cases with silicosis, Gastroenterol, 709
  3. Ren, 1993, Detection of coal silicosis by radioimmunoassay used for ceruloplasmin, Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis, 145
  4. Prakova, 2005, The potential role of neopterin as a biomarker for silicosis, Trakia J Sci, 37
  5. Wang, 1998, Serum concentration of copper and zinc in patients with silicosis.J, Occup Health, 230
  6. Tiwari, 2005, Serum angiotensin converting enzyme activity and serum copper levels in convert silicosis, Indian J Occup Environ Med, 124

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pandey, J., & Agarwal, D.
Affiliations
Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research (IN)
Venue
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2012
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
101
ISSN
  • 0019-5278 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-2284
OpenAlex
W2078181637
Cited by
47
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
CSIR-Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Industrial and Mining Safety
Keywords
silicosis, biomarkers, prognostic factors, pneumoconiosis, silica exposure, occupational dust exposure, pulmonary fibrosis, early diagnosis, serum biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review