The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Homology modeling a fast tool for drug discovery: Current perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Major goal of structural biology involve formation of protein-ligand complexes; in which the protein molecules act energetically in the course of binding. Therefore, perceptive of protein-ligand interaction will be very important for structure based drug design. Lack of knowledge of 3D structures has hindered efforts to understand the binding specificities of ligands with protein. With increasing in modeling software and the growing number of known protein structures, homology modeling is rapidly becoming the method of choice for obtaining 3D coordinates of proteins. Homology modeling is a representation of the similarity of environmental residues at topologically corresponding positions in the reference proteins. In the absence of experimental data, model building on the basis of a known 3D structure of a homologous protein is at present the only reliable method to obtain the structural information. Knowledge of the 3D structures of proteins provides invaluable insights into the molecular basis of their functions. The recent advances in homology modeling, particularly in detecting and aligning sequences with template structures, distant homologues, modeling of loops and side chains as well as detecting errors in a model contributed to consistent prediction of protein structure, which was not possible even several years ago. This review focused on the features and a role of homology modeling in predicting protein structure and described current developments in this field with victorious applications at the different stages of the drug design and discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
Thompson, J. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 · Cited by 38,993
PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures
Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889892009944 · Cited by 24,581
A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules
Cornell, W. D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C. I., Gould, I. R., Merz, K. M., Ferguson, D. M., Spellmeyer, D. C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J. W., & Kollman, P. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00124a002 · Cited by 13,103
Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints
Šali, A., & Blundell, T. L. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 · Cited by 12,977
SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling
Guex, N., & Peitsch, M. C. (1997) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.1150181505 · Cited by 11,241
T-coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment 1 1Edited by J. Thornton
Notredame, C., Higgins, D. G., & Heringa, J. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 · Cited by 6,852
Eddy, S. R. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · Cited by 5,515
MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment
Katoh, K. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki198 · Cited by 4,837
Cited by
Computational methods in drug discovery
Leelananda, S. P., & Lindert, S. (2016) · Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.267 · Cited by 639
Serum albumin in health and disease: esterase, antioxidant, transporting and signaling properties
Belinskaia, D. A., Voronina, P. A., Shmurak, V. I., Jenkins, R. O., & Goncharov, N. V. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms221910318 · Cited by 416
How accurately can one predict drug binding modes using AlphaFold models?
Karelina, M., Noh, J. J., & Dror, R. O. (2023) · doi:10.7554/elife.89386.1 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Vyas, V., Ukawala, R., Chintha, C., & Ghate, M.
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- OMICS Publishing Group
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0250-474X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992842793
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 145
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Homology modeling a fast tool for drug discovery: Current perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/0250-474x.102537
- The paper
- Vyas, V., Ukawala, R., Chintha, C., & Ghate, M. (2012). Homology modeling a fast tool for drug discovery: Current perspectives. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474x.102537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.