Cited by 17Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyLymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis

Mycobacterial culture of fine needle aspirate-A useful tool in diagnosing tuberculous lymphadenitis

Open access
Aparna, S, Prasad, CE, Srinivas, A, Triveni, B, Gokhale, S, Krishna Moorthy, KV, Kishore Reddy, VC·2008·Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology

Abstract

A prospective study was undertaken on suspected lymph node TB (LNTB) patients, to evaluate the diagnostic utility of mycobacterial culture of fine needle aspirate (FNA), in comparison with the cytological examination and acid fast staining. Eighty percent of 157 aspirates studied were positive by cytological examination; 18% by ZN smear and 45% were positive by culture. Twelve aspirates which were negative by cytological features yielded positive mycobacterial cultures; four out of these were from HIV positive patients. Our observations suggest that supplementing FNA cytology with mycobacterial culture would increase the sensitivity of diagnosing LNTB; in addition to giving a highly specific diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0255-0857.42040

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. Rajasekaran S, Gunasekaran M, Jayakumar DD, Jeyaganesh D, Bhanumathi V. Tuberculous cervical lymphadenitis in HIV positive and negative patients. Indian J Tuberc 2001;48:201.
  2. [3]3. Verenkar MP, Kamath K, Pinto WM, Rodrigues S, Wiseman Pinto RG. Mycobacteriological study of Þ ne needle aspirates in cervical lymphadenitis. Indian J Tuberc 1996;43:187.
  3. [4]4. Rattan A. PCR for diagnosis of tuberculosis: Where are we now? Indian J Tuberc 2000;47:79-82.
  4. [5]5. Vielh W. The techniques of FNA cytology. In : Orell SR, Sterett FG, Walters MN, Whitaker D, editors. Chapter 2. Manual and atlas of Þ ne needle aspiration cytology. 3 rd ed. NY, USA: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aparna, S., Prasad, C., Srinivas, A., Triveni, B., Gokhale, S., Krishna Moorthy, K., & Kishore Reddy, V.
Affiliations
  • Lepra Society (IN)
  • Osmania Medical College (IN)
  • Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN)
Venue
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
259
ISSN
0255-0857 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020887223
Cited by
17
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • Bioline International (Bioline International) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
Keywords
tuberculous lymphadenitis, mycobacterial culture, fine needle aspirate, cytology, acid-fast staining, diagnostic sensitivity, people living with HIV
MeSH terms
Humans, Mycobacterium, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tuberculosis, Lymph Node, HIV Infections, Biopsy, Fine-Needle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review