Cited by 29Herpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsViral Infections and Immunology ResearchCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of a conventional polymerase chain reaction with real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of neurotropic viruses in cerebrospinal fluid samples

Open access
Ramamurthy, M, Alexander, M, Aaron, S, Kannangai, R, Ravi, V, Sridharan, G, Abraham, AM·2011·Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare a conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR for the detection of neurotropic DNA viruses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 147 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples was collected from patients attending a tertiary care hospital in South India for a period from 2005 to 2008. All these samples were tested using a conventional multiplex/uniplex PCR and a real-time multiplex/uniplex PCR. This technique was used to detect a large number of herpes viruses responsible for central nervous system infections, including HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, CMV and EBV and the polyoma virus JCV. RESULTS: Overall, in the entire set of samples, the real-time PCR yielded 88 (59.9%) positives and conventional PCR had six (4.1%) positives. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the real-time PCR assay was more sensitive compared with the conventional PCR. The advantage of real-time PCR is that it can be performed much faster than conventional PCR. Real-time PCR is less time-consuming, less labour-intensive and also reduces the chance of contamination as there is no post-amplification procedure. In the entire study population, the major viruses detected using real-time PCR were EBV (34%), HSV-2 (10.8%) and VZV (6.8%).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0255-0857.81777

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ramamurthy, M., Alexander, M., Aaron, S., Kannangai, R., Ravi, V, Sridharan, G., & Abraham, A.
Affiliations
Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN)
Venue
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
102-109
ISSN
0255-0857 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024670282
Cited by
28
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Keywords
real-time PCR, conventional PCR, neurotropic viruses, cerebrospinal fluid, herpesvirus, central nervous system infection, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, diagnostic sensitivity, virus detection
MeSH terms
Cerebrospinal Fluid, Herpesviridae, Humans, India, JC Virus, Sensitivity and Specificity, Virology, Virus Diseases, Prevalence, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Clinical Laboratory Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review