Diabetes control in a primary care setting : A retrospective study of 651 patients
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As part of an ongoing evaluation of the process of care, the management of type 2 diabetes in primary healthcare settings was studied in a series of audits with the objective of improving diabetes care in a primary care center of the Saudi National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A sample of 30 files was randomly selected every 2 weeks from a sampling frame of medical records of type 2 diabetes patients seen over the previous two weeks. The criterion of good management was arbitrarily defined as a glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) less than 7%, with a test frequency of once every 3 months. The proportion of patients not conforming to the criterion was reported back to the care providers. Specially trained nurses did all randomization, data extraction, and entry. RESULTS: Data were extracted form 651 medical records, including 355 (54.5%) for females and 296 (45.5%) for males. Both the mean and median age of those studied was 53 years. Mean HbA(1c) was 9.0+/-2.0%, mean fasting plasma glucose was 9.9A+/-3.9 mmol/L, and mean 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose was 15.0+/-5.3 mmol/L. In 20.6% (134/651) (95% CI, 17.5%-23.9%) of patients the HbA(1c) level was less than 7%. Only 10.4% (68/651) (95% CI, 8.2%-13.0%) had HbA(1c) measured in the previous 3 months that was less than 7.0% and thus met the criterion for good management. In the previous 3 months, 55.4% (95% CI, 51.5%-59.3%) had been tested for HbA(1c). CONCLUSION: Management of diabetes at the primary care level leaves much to be desired. There is a need for an ongoing process of evaluation to follow up the implementation of care guidelines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prevalence of poor glycemic control in this study is similar to other Saudi populations.
“This was significantly similar to other Saudi populations. Several studies reported similar prevalence of poor glycemic control (73%, 76%, and 79.4%) [26–28].”
From Factors Associated with Long-Term Control of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (2016) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin
(2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012512 · Cited by 19,011 · see citing works
Tuomilehto, J., Lindström, J., Eriksson, J. G., Valle, T. T., Hämäläinen, H., Ilanne-Parikka, P., Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S., Laakso, M., Louheranta, A., Rastas, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105033441801 · Cited by 10,873 · see citing works
Ziemer, D. C., Doyle, J. P., Barnes, C. S., Branch, W. T., Cook, C. B., El-Kebbi, I. M., Gallina, D. L., Kolm, P., Rhee, M. K., & Phillips, L. S. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.5.507 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors Associated with Long-Term Control of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Badedi, M., Solan, Y., Darraj, H., Sabai, A., Mahfouz, M., Alamodi, S., & Alsabaani, A. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Research · doi:10.1155/2016/2109542 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
- Authors
- Al-Hussein, F.
- Venue
- Annals of Saudi Medicine
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267
- ISSN
- 0256-4947 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6074353
- OpenAlex
- W1994160511
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Annals of Saudi Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Annals of Saudi Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, primary care, diabetes care quality, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Saudi Arabia, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review