Cited by 9Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Secondary laryngeal tuberculosis revisited

Open access
Lodha, JainiV, Sharma, Arpit, Virmani, Nitish, Bihani, Ameya, Dabholkar, JyotiP·2015·Lung India

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laryngeal tuberculosis is often misdiagnosed and is a highly contagious public health problem. The changing pattern of the clinical involvement of this disease poses a diagnostic challenge. The authors report four cases of laryngeal tuberculosis encountered in a short span of one month. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the four patients who presented to us with hoarseness had underlying active lesions in the lung. In spite of that they presented with mainly laryngeal symptoms and a multitude of findings on laryngeal examination. A diagnosis could be established owing to a high index of clinical suspicion, and due consideration given to the chest findings and positive sputum examination. The patients showed an excellent response to antituberculous therapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the varied nature of laryngeal tuberculosis and the importance of addressing the hoarseness of a patient at the earliest, for the prompt diagnosis of this infectious condition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0970-2113.164163

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kandiloros, 1995, Laryn gealtuber culosisat the end of the 20th century, J Laryngol Otol, 5
  2. Harney, 2000, Laryn gealtuber culosis: An important diagnosis, J Laryngol Otol, 878

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Lodha, J., Sharma, A., Virmani, N., Bihani, A., & Dabholkar, J.
Affiliations
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College (IN)
Venue
Lung India
Published
2015
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
462
ISSN
0970-2113 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116335443
Cited by
9
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Lung India (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
laryngeal tuberculosis, hoarseness, pulmonary tuberculosis, sputum examination, tuberculosis treatment, misdiagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review