CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neoliberal conservation, garifuna territorial rights and resource management in the cayos cochinos marine protected area

Brondo, KeriVacanti, Bown, Natalie·2011·Conservation and Society
DOI 10.4103/0972-4923.83720
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0972-4923.83720

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Anderson M. Garifuna kids: Blackness, modernity, and tradition in Honduras. 2000 Austin, TX, USA University of Texas at Austin Ph.D. thesis.
  2. Anderson M. Black and indigenous: Garifuna activism and consumer culture in Honduras. 2009 Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press
  3. Berlanga M., Faust B.B.. We thought we wanted a reserve: One community′s disillusionment with government conservation management Conservation and Society. 2007;5(4):450–477
  4. Bookbinder M.P., Dinerstein E., Rijal A., Cualey H., Rajouria A.. Ecotourism′s support of biodiversity conservation Conservation Biology. 1998;12(6):1399–1404
  5. Brockington D. Fortress conservation: The preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. 2002 Bloomington, IN Indiana University Press
  6. Brondo K.V.. Garifuna women′s land loss and activism in Honduras Journal of International Women′s Studies. 2007;9(1):99–116
  7. Brondo K.V.. When mestizo becomes (like) indio…or is it Garifuna?: Negotiating indigeneity and ′making place′ on Honduras′ north coast Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology. 2010;15(1):171–194
  8. Brondo K.V., Woods L.. Garifuna land rights and ecotourism as economic development in Honduras′ Cayos Cochinos marine protected area Ecological and Environmental Anthropology. 2007;3(1):1–18
  9. Büscher B.. Conservation, neoliberalism, and social science: A critical reflection on the SCB 2007 Annual Meeting in South Africa Conservation and Society. 2008;22(2):229–231
  10. Büscher B., Dressler W.. Linking neoprotectionism and environmental governance: On the rapidly increasing tensions between actors in the environment-development nexus Conservation and Society. 2007;5(4):586–611
  11. Büscher B., Whande W.. Whims of the winds of time? Emerging trends in biodiversity conservation and protected area management Conservation and Society. 2007;5(1):22–43
  12. Castree N.. Neoliberalizing nature: Processes, effects and evaluations Environment and Planning A. 2008a;40(1):153–173
  13. Castree N.. Neoliberalizing nature: The logics of de- and re-regulation Environment and Planning A. 2008b;40(1):131–152
  14. Cayetano S., Cayetano F.. Garifuna history, language and culture of Belize, Central America and the Caribbean Bicentennial edition. 1997 Belize April 12th 1797-1997
  15. Chernela J.. Symbolic interaction in rituals of gender and procreation among the Garifuna (Black Caribs) of Honduras Ethos. 1991;19(1):52–69
  16. Cochrane K.L.. Reconciling sustainability, economic efficiency and equity in fisheries: The one that got away? Fish and Fisheries. 2001;1(1):3–21
  17. England S. Afro-central Americans in New York City: Garifuna tales of transnational movements in racialized space. 2006 Gainesville, FL University of Florida Press
  18. Ferguson J. The anti-politics machine: Development, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. 1994 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press
  19. Fortwangler C.. Friends with money: Private support for a national park in the US Virgin Islands Conservation and Society. 2007;5(4):504–533
  20. Foster B.. The politics of ritual: The development of the Garifuna cult of the dead on St. Vincent First annual studies on Belize conference. 1987 Belize City
  21. González N.L. Sojourners of the Caribbean: Ethnogenesis and ethnohistory of the Garifuna. 1988 Urbana, IL University of Illinois Press
  22. Grandia L.. Between Bolivar and bureaucracy: The Mesoamerican biological corridor Conservation and Society. 2007;5(4):478–503
  23. Hale C.. Neoliberal multiculturalism: The remaking of cultural rights and racial dominance in Central America Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 2005;28(1):10–28
  24. Hanson P.W.. Governmentality, language ideology, and the production of needs in Malagasy conservation and development Cultural Anthropology. 2007;22(2):244–284
  25. Harbourne A., Daniel R., Afzal C., Andrews M.J.. Honduras: Caribbean coast Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2001;42(12):1221–1235
  26. Heynen N., McCarthy J., Robbins P. Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences. 2007 Routledge New York
  27. Heynen N., Robbins P.. The neoliberalisation of nature: Governance, privatization, enclosure, and valuation Capitalism, Socialism, Nature, Socialism. 2005;16(4):5–8
  28. Hitchcock R.K.. Centralisation, resource depletion, and coercive conservation among the Tyua of the northeastern Kalahari Human Ecology. 1995;23:168–198
  29. Hitchcock R.K., Biesele M., Babchuk W.A.. Environmental anthropology in the Kalahari: Development, resettlement, and ecological change among the San of Southern Africa Vis-à-vis: Enquiries in Anthropology. 2009;9(2):155–173
  30. Hoffman D.M.. Institutional legitimacy and co-management of a marine protected area: Implementation lessons from the case of Xcalak Reefs National Park, Mexico Human Organization. 2009;68(1):39–54
  31. Holt F.L.. The catch-22 of conservation: Indigenous peoples, biologists, and cultural change Human Ecology. 2005;33(2):199–215
  32. Hutton J.W.M. Adams, Murombedzi J.C.. Back to the barriers? Changing narratives in biodiversity conservation Forum for Development Studies. 2005;2:341–370
  33. Igoe J., Brockington D.. Neoliberal conservation: A brief introduction Conservation and Society. 2007;5(4):432–449
  34. Igoe J., Croucher B.. Conservation, commerce and communities: The story of community-based wildlife management areas in Tanzania′s northern tourist circuit Conservation and Society. 2007;5(4):534–561
  35. Jentoft S., McCay B.J., Wilson D.C.. Social theory and fisheries co-management Marine Policy. 1998;22(4-5):423–436
  36. Johnston B.R. Life and death matters: Human rights, environment, and social justice. 2nd Edition. 2007 Walnut Creek, CA Left Coast Press
  37. Kaplan I.M., McCay B.J.. Cooperative research, co-management and the social dimension of fisheries science and management Marine Policy. 2004;28(3):257–258
  38. Kerns V. Women and the ancestors: Black Carib kinship and ritual. 1983 Urbana University of Illinois Press
  39. Lemos C., Agrawal A.. Environmental governance Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2006;31:297–325
  40. Liverman D., Vilas S.. Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2006;31:327–363
  41. McAfee K.. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 1999;17:133–154
  42. Mikalsen K.H., Jentoft S.. From user-groups to stakeholders? The public interest in fisheries management Marine Policy. 2001;25(4):281–292
  43. Mosse D.. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice Development and Change. 2004;35(4):639–671
  44. Mosse D. Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. 2005 London Pluto Press
  45. Pinkerton E. Cooperative management of local fisheries: New directions for improved management and community development. 1989 Vancouver University of British Columbia Press
  46. Pomeroy R.S., Berkes F.. Two to tango: The role of government in fisheries co-management Marine Policy. 1997;21(5):465–480
  47. Puntenney P.J.. Defining solutions: The Annapurna experience Cultural Survival Quarterly. 1990;14(2):9–14
  48. Safa H.I.. Challenging mestizaje: A gender perspective on indigenous and afrodescendant movements in Latin America Critique of Anthropology. 2005;25:307–330
  49. Safa H.I.. Racial and gender inequality in Latin America: Afro-descendent women respond Feminist Africa. 2008;7:49–66
  50. Thorne E.. Land rights and Garifuna identity NACLA Report on the Americas.. 2004;38(2):23–25
  51. Vivanco L.A.. Spectacular quetzlas, ecotourism, and environmental futures in Monte Verde, Costa Rica Ethnology. 2001;402:79–92
  52. West P., Carrier J.. Ecotourism and authenticity: Getting away from it all? Current Anthropology. 2004;45(4):483–498
  53. West P., Igoe J., Brockington D.. Parks and people: The social impact of protected areas Annual Review of Anthropology. 2006;35:251–2 27. neoliberal conservation; Cayos Cochinos Marine Protected Area; indigenous rights; Garifuna; Honduras

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brondo, K., & Bown, N.
Venue
Conservation and Society
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2011
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
91
ISSN
0972-4923
DOI
10.4103/0972-4923.83720
Cited by
34
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review