Cited by 61Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CareReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Depression and demoralization as distinct syndromes: preliminary data from a cohort of advanced cancer patients

Open access
Jacobsen, JulietC, Vanderwerker, LaurenC, Block, SusanD, Friedlander, RobertJ, Maciejewski, PaulK, Prigerson, HollyG·2006·Indian Journal of Palliative Care

Abstract

The term demoralization has been used to describe existential distress and despair of patients with advanced disease. Aim: This study sought to determine whether a cluster of symptoms interpreted as demoralization could be identified and distinguished from a cluster of depressive symptoms. Materials and Methods: As part of the Coping with Cancer Study, a federally funded multi-site study of advanced cancer patients, 242 patients were interviewed on a broad range of mental health parameters related to depression, grief, quality of life, self-efficacy, coping and religiousness/spirituality. Results: A principal components analysis revealed separate depression and demoralization/despair factors. Seven symptoms constituted the demoralization/despair factor: loss of control, loss of hope, anger/bitterness, sense of failure, feeling life was a burden, loss of meaning and a belief that life′s meaning is dependent on health and were found to be internally consistent (Cronbach′s a = 0.78). Only 14.8% of subjects with "syndromal demoralization" met DSM-IV criteria for Major Depression (MDD); 7.4% for Minor Depression. Of those with MDD only 28.6% had syndromal level demoralization. Prior history of MDD predicted current MDD, but not syndromal demoralization. Demoralization, not MDD, was significantly associated with the patient′s reported level of inner peacefulness. When compared with MDD, syndromal demoralization was more strongly associated with wish to live and wish to die and equally predictive of mental health service use. Conclusion: The symptoms of demoralization are distinct from depressive symptoms and appear to be associated with the patient′s degree of inner peacefulness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0973-1075.25913

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobsen, J., Vanderwerker, L., Block, S., Friedlander, R., Maciejewski, P., & Prigerson, H.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Published
2006
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
8
ISSN
0973-1075 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112637670
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
demoralization, depression, advanced cancer, existential suffering, despair, major depressive disorder, desire for death, mental health service utilization, coping with cancer, hopelessness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review