Clinical research regulation in India-history, development, initiatives, challenges and controversies: still long way to go
Open accessAbstract
The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation and its chairman Drug Controller general of India are bequeathed to protect the citizens from the marketing of unsafe medication. The startling findings, of the 59(th)report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare, have uncovered the lax standards followed by the regulatory authorities in India. The growing clinical research after the product patents rights for the pharmaceutical industries as per the trade related aspects of intellectual property rights agreement and adverse drug reaction monitoring of the marketed drugs have raised many ethical and regulatory issues regarding the promotion of new drugs in Indian markets. Many controversial group of medicines; unauthorised and irrational FDCs not relevant to India's medical needs, are available which are not sold in any of the countries with matured regulatory bodies. It becomes vital to understand the history, growth and evolution of the regulatory aspects of drugs which are handled by multiple Ministries and Departments of the Government of India. Although amendment to Schedule Y, registration of Contract Research Organisations, registration of Clinical Trials, Speeding up review process, Pharmacovigilance (PhV) programme for India and Inspection of clinical trial sites have been started by the various regulatory agencies. However due to casual approach in marketing approval for sale of the drugs, the unethical steps taken by some pharmaceutical companies and medical practitioners has reiterated the need to get appropriate understanding of present regulation of drugs and clinical research especially regarding the practical rules and regulations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Indian pharmaceutical industry operates under a complex and evolving regulatory environment.
“However, the Indian pharmaceutical industry operates under a complex and evolving regulatory environment (Imran et al., 2013).”
From Exploring the antecedents of AI adoption for effective HRM practices in the Indian pharmaceutical sector (2023) · cites this paper as Imran et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ICH harmonized tripartite guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice.
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 223 · see citing works
A New Colonialism? — Conducting Clinical Trials in India
Nundy, S., & Gulhati, C. M. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp048361 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Ezzelle, J., Rodriguez-Chavez, I. R., Darden, J. M., Stirewalt, M., Kunwar, N., Hitchcock, R., Walter, T. J., & D’Souza, M. P. (2007) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2007.10.010 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Intellectual property rights: An overview and implications in pharmaceutical industry
Bhattacharya, S., & Saha, C. N. (2011) · Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology amp Research · doi:10.4103/2231-4040.82952 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: do you want a piece of me?
Kapp, M. B. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.030957 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Clinical trials in India: ethical concerns
Chatterjee, P. (2008) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.08.010808 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Maiti, R., & M, R. (2007) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2007.02.004 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
ICMR’s Ethical guidelines for biomedical research on human participants: need for clarification
Ananthakrishnan, N., & Shanthi, A. K. (2012) · Indian Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.20529/ijme.2012.067 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Thatte, U., & Bavdekar, S. (2008) · Journal of Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.4103/0022-3859.43517 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Pharmaceutical GMP: past, present, and future – a review
Patel, K. T., & Chotai, N. (2008) · Die Pharmazie · doi:10.31083/ph.2008.7319 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Registering clinical trials in India: a scientific and ethical imperative.
Tharyan, P., & Ghersi, D. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A detailed study of patent system for protection of inventions
Rao, B., & Tulasi, G. (2008) · Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.4103/0250-474x.45390 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Good clinical practice: a nuisance, a help or a necessity for clinical pharmacology?
Sweatman, J. (2003) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01713.x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Quality of independent review board/ethics committee oversight in clinical trials in India
Pandiya, A. (2011) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/2229-3485.80364 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Indian clinical trials: Paradigm shift from speed to quality?
Bhatt, A. (2012) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/2229-3485.92299 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Trials and tribulations of clinical research teaching and training
Ghooi, R. (2010) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/2229-3485.71773 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The health of European medical research
Hunter, P. (2011) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2010.212 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Integrated monitoring: Setting new standards for the next decade of clinical trial practice
Rai, K. (2011) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/2229-3485.76287 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Drug trials in children: Doubts and dilemmas
Dalvi, B. V. (2008) · Annals of Pediatric Cardiology · doi:10.4103/0974-2069.43871 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
How to minimize low enrolling sites: A case study in diabetes
Abraham, A., Jones, J., & Vikram, S. (2010) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/2229-3485.71843 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The GATT TRIPS agreement and health care in India.
Otten, A. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The GATT TRIPS Agreement and health care in India.
Otten, A. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]Confederation of Indian Industry. Background paper Conference on Clinical research: Roadmap for India, New Delhi 2003 9 24-25 Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07 Available from: http://www.icriindia.com/pdf/conference.on.clinical.research.road.map.for.india.pdf
- [10]Social Sector: Volume II; Planning Commission, Government of India Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012) 2008 New Delhi Oxford University Press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Goswami, M., Jain, S., Alam, T., Deifalla, A. F., Ragab, A. E., & Khargotra, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1215706 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Imran, M., Najmi, A., Rashid, M., Tabrez, S., & Shah, M.
- Affiliations
- Jamia Hamdard (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Imran, Mohammed
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2
- ISSN
- 0975-7406 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3612334
- OpenAlex
- W1976739527
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Atomic Energy Regulatory Board
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Keywords
- clinical research regulation, drug regulation, pharmaceutical patents, TRIPS Agreement, adverse drug reaction monitoring, pharmacovigilance, fixed-dose combination, clinical trial registration, drug marketing approval, pharmaceutical industry ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review