Cited by 15Innovations in Medical EducationEmergency Medicine Education and ResearchPsychiatric care and mental health services

Outcomes from the trial implementation of a multidisciplinary online learning program in rural mental health emergency care

Hills, DJ, Robinson, T, Kelly, B, Heathcote, S·2010·Education for Health

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Emergency Departments (EDs) are often the first point of contact for people with acute mental health problems. The impact of the Mental Health Emergency Care (MHEC) online learning program on the knowledge and skills development of clinicians and support staff was evaluated, and options for sustainable implementation of the program were proposed. METHODS: Participants were recruited from the four rural health services and the rural areas of one metropolitan health service in New South Wales, Australia. The MHEC course was conducted online over 24 weeks and comprised four sequential modules, each based on a clinical scenario that demonstrated a typical, acute mental health presentation to a general hospital ED. The course was designed to model collaborative practice in mental health emergency care. RESULTS: Participants were surveyed before and after completing the MHEC course. Statistically significant improvements were detected in participant confidence in managing key mental health problems, perceived self-efficacy in dealing with challenging, aggressive behaviours and confidence in key online learning skills. Participants also reported very positive experiences in relation to the course content and structure, instructor support, multidisciplinary discussion and feedback, and improvements in their knowledge and skills about emergency mental healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the effectiveness and acceptability of an online educational program in developing the capacity of front-line staff to respond effectively to people who present to EDs with acute mental health problems. The positive outcomes and evaluations of the MHEC course provide support for the deployment of online learning programs that address mental health emergency care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/1357-6283.101503

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hills, D., Robinson, T., Kelly, B., & Heathcote, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health (AU)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Venue
Education for Health
Published
2010
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
351
ISSN
1357-6283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1910021253
Cited by
15
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Education for Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency Medicine Education and Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
online learning, emergency department, rural health care, multidisciplinary education, clinician knowledge and skills, self-efficacy, program implementation, collaborative practice
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Cooperative Behavior, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Online Systems, Patient Care Team, Surveys and Questionnaires, Program Evaluation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Statistics, Nonparametric, Rural Health Services, Education, Distance, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review