Cited by 20Diversity and Career in MedicineCareer Development and DiversityMedical Education and Admissions

Medical education resources initiative for teens program in baltimore: A model pipeline program built on four pillars

Wright, ScottM, Mains, TylerE, Wilcox, MarkV·2016·Education for Health

Abstract

Background Less than 6% of U.S. medical school applicants are African-American. The lack of diversity among physicians, by race as well as other measures, confers a negative impact on the American healthcare system because underrepresented minority (URM) physicians are more likely to practice in underserved communities and deliver more equitable, culturally competent care. Methods MERIT (Medical Education Resources Initiative for Teens) is a nonprofit organization based in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. MERIT prepares URM high school students for health careers by providing a holistic support system for seven consecutive years. The program model, which utilizes weekly Saturday sessions, summer internships, and longitudinal mentoring, is built on four foundational pillars: (1) Ignite the Fire, (2) Illuminate the Path, (3) Create the Toolkit, and (4) Sustain the Desire. Results Since 2011, MERIT has supported 51 students in the Baltimore City Public School System. For the past two years, 100% (n = 14) of MERIT seniors enrolled in universities, compared to only 20.2% of Baltimore City students overall. While it is too early to know whether MERIT alumni will realize their goals of becoming healthcare professionals, they are currently excelling in universities and over 75% (n = 17) are still planning to pursue graduate degrees in health-related fields. Discussion After piloting an effective program model, MERIT now has three key priorities moving forward: (1) Creating a sustainable and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/1357-6283.178935

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BxCHL program design embraces the four pillars of successful longitudinal mentoring programs proposed by Mains and colleagues.

    “This design embraces the four pillars of successful longitudinal mentoring programs proposed by Mains and colleagues, including the ability to “ignite the fire,” “illuminate the path,” “create the toolkit,” and “sustain the desire.”17”

Cited by

Authors
Wright, S., Mains, T., & Wilcox, M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, ScottM
Venue
Education for Health
Published
2016
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
47
ISSN
1357-6283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299577827
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Education for Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
pipeline programs, underrepresented minority students, African American students, medical school applicants, high school students, mentoring, summer internship, program sustainability, Baltimore
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Career Choice, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Mentors, Minority Groups, School Admission Criteria, Social Support, Students, Medical, Baltimore, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review