Doctors of tomorrow: an innovative curriculum connecting underrepresented minority high school students to medical school
Abstract
Background Racial minorities continue to be underrepresented in medicine (URiM). Increasing provider diversity is an essential component of addressing disparity in health delivery and outcomes. The pool of students URiM that are competitive applicants to medical school is often limited early on by educational inequalities in primary and secondary schooling. A growing body of evidence recognizing the importance of diversifying health professions advances the need for medical schools to develop outreach collaborations with primary and secondary schools to attract URiMs. The goal of this paper is to describe and evaluate a program that seeks to create a pipeline for URiMs early in secondary schooling by connecting these students with support and resources in the medical community that may be transformative in empowering these students to be stronger university and medical school applicants. Methods The authors described a medical student-led, action-oriented pipeline program, Doctors of Tomorrow, which connects faculty and medical students at the University of Michigan Medical School with 9th grade students at Cass Technical High School (Cass Tech) in Detroit, Michigan. The program includes a core curriculum of hands-on experiential learning, development, and presentation of a capstone project, and mentoring of 9th grade students by medical students. Cass Tech student feedback was collected using focus groups, critical incident written narratives, and individual interviews. Medi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are minimal reports about the personal impact of pipeline programs on participants and what elements contribute most to students' perception of their own success pursuing a health career.
“This gap in our knowledge is further compounded by minimal reports about the personal impact they have on participants, and what elements contribute most to the students' perception of their own success pursuing a health career.15–17”
From Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
<p>Medical student mentoring programs: current insights</p>
Nimmons, D., Giny, S., & Rosenthal, J. (2019) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s154974 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs
Stephenson-Hunter, C., Strelnick, A. H., Rodriguez, N., Stumpf, L. A., Spano, H., & Gonzalez, C. M. (2021) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2020.0126 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Derck, J., Zahn, K., Finks, J. F., Mand, S. K., & Sandhu, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Michigan Medicine (US)
- Venue
- PubMed
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-265
- OpenAlex
- W2750600501
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- underrepresented minorities in medicine, high school students, mentoring, experiential learning, capstone projects, racial disparities in health care, community partnerships
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Career Choice, Curriculum, Female, Humans, Male, Mentors, Michigan, Minority Groups, Schools, Medical, Students, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review