Amyloid-beta peptide and tau protein crosstalk in Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessAbstract
Alzheimer's disease is a neurodegenerative disease that accounts for most of the 50-million dementia cases worldwide in 2018. A large amount of evidence supports the amyloid cascade hypothesis, which states that amyloid-beta accumulation triggers tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation in form of neurofibrillary tangles, and these aggregates lead to inflammation, synaptic impairment, neuronal loss, and thus to cognitive decline and behavioral abnormalities. The poor correlation found between cognitive decline and amyloid plaques, have led the scientific community to question whether amyloid-beta accumulation is actually triggering neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. The occurrence of tau neurofibrillary tangles better correlates to neuronal loss and clinical symptoms and, although amyloid-beta may initiate the cascade of events, tau impairment is likely the effector molecule of neurodegeneration. Recently, it has been shown that amyloid-beta and tau cooperatively work to impair transcription of genes involved in synaptic function and, more importantly, that downregulation of tau partially reverses transcriptional perturbations. Despite mounting evidence points to an interplay between amyloid-beta and tau, some factors could independently affect both pathologies. Thus, the dual pathway hypothesis, which states that there are common upstream triggers causing both amyloid-beta and tau abnormalities has been proposed. Among others, the immune system seems to be strongly involved in amyloid-beta and tau pathologies. Other factors, as the apolipoprotein E ε4 isoform has been suggested to act as a link between amyloid-beta and tau hyperphosphorylation. Interestingly, amyloid-beta-immunotherapy reduces not only amyloid-beta but also tau levels in animal models and in clinical trials. Likewise, it has been shown that tau-immunotherapy also reduces amyloid-beta levels. Thus, even though amyloid-beta immunotherapy is more advanced than tau-immunotherapy, combined amyloid-beta and tau-directed therapies at early stages of the disease have recently been proposed as a strategy to stop the progression of Alzheimer's disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chronic activation of Aβ can cause hyperphosphorylation of tau and the creation of neurofibrillary tangles that lead to AD pathology in aged individuals, due to their reduced efficiency in Aβ and tau clearance.
“Chronic activation of Aβ can cause hyperphosphorylation of tau and the creation of neurofibrillary tangles [109] that lead to AD pathology in aged individuals [104,110], due to their reduced efficiency in Aβ and tau clearance [110].”
From What would it take to prove that a chronic infection is a causal agent in Alzheimer’s disease? (2025) · cites this paper as [109]
The amyloid cascade hypothesis section (Figure 2; page unavailable) says impaired Aβ clearance can contribute to Aβ accumulation, and that Aβ oligomers induce tau hyperphosphorylation and eventual neurofibrillary tangles. The Introduction identifies AD as a major cause of disability among elderly people. Neither passage says that aging reduces clearance of both Aβ and tau, so the sentence’s proposed explanation for pathology in aged individuals is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTau phosphorylation and aggregation are the key causes of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease.
“Therefore, tau phosphorylation and aggregation are the key causes of neurodegeneration in AD [36].”
From Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of Medicinal Plants for Alzheimer’s Disease: Preclinical to Clinical Trial Insights (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 306
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [3]Alzforum AAT-AD/PDTM 2020 Conference: Advances in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Therapies 2020
- Authors
- Villegas, S., Roda, A., Serra-Mir, G., Montoliu-Gaya, L., & Tiessler, L.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Villegas, Sandra
- Venue
- Neural Regeneration Research
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1666
- ISSN
- 1673-5374 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8820696
- OpenAlex
- W4200390523
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 30
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Neural Regeneration Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, tau protein, tau hyperphosphorylation, neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid hypothesis, gene transcription, synaptic function, neuroinflammation, APOE ε4, amyloid-beta immunotherapy, tau immunotherapy, combination immunotherapy, neurodegeneration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review