The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital images and the future of digital pathology
Open accessAbstract
Digital imaging today represents more of an evolution than a revolution in pathology.In a recent Scientific American review of digital pathology, the editors point out that (1) an overhaul of pathology integrating digital images is long overdue, (2) promising techniques are allowing digital images to be manipulated in novel ways, and (3) digital pathology will in due course permit more precise diagnoses.[1] In pathology, digital images can be used to make primary diagnoses, offer second opinions (consultation), for telepathology, quality assurance (e.g.re-review and proficiency testing), archiving and sharing, education and conferencing, image analysis, research and publications, marketing and business purposes, as well as tracking (e.g.audit trail of how an image was viewed).Widespread adoption of digital pathology has been hindered not only by cost and technical factors, but also largely by the mindset of technophobic pathologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: Prospects for the future
Weinstein, R. S., Graham, A. R., Richter, L. C., Barker, G. P., Krupinski, E. A., Lopez, A. M., Erps, K. A., Bhattacharyya, A. K., Yagi, Y., & Gilbertson, J. R. (2009) · Human Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.006 · Cited by 380
Cited by
Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis
Komura, D., & Ishikawa, S. (2018) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2018.01.001 · Cited by 937
Multiplexed coded illumination for Fourier Ptychography with an LED array microscope
Tian, L., Li, X., Ramchandran, K., & Waller, L. (2014) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.5.002376 · Cited by 584
A Practical Guide to Whole Slide Imaging: A White Paper From the Digital Pathology Association
Zarella, M. D., Bowman;, D., Aeffner, F., Farahani, N., Xthona;, A., Absar, S. F., Parwani, A., Bui, M., & Hartman, D. J. (2019) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/arpa.2018-0343-ra · Cited by 404
Pantanowitz, L., Sharma, A., Carter, A. B., Kurc, T., Sussman, A., & Saltz, J. (2018) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_69_18 · Cited by 282
Self-citationThe explainability paradox: Challenges for xAI in digital pathology
Evans, T., Retzlaff, C. O., Geißler, C., Kargl, M., Plass, M., Müller, H., Kiehl, T.-R., Zerbe, N., & Holzinger, A. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2022.03.009 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Pantanowitz, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Pathology Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15
- ISSN
- 2153-3539 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997864537
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital images and the future of digital pathology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/2153-3539.68332
- The paper
- Pantanowitz, L. (2010). Digital images and the future of digital pathology. Journal of Pathology Informatics. https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.68332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
