Cited by 48Nutrition and Health StudiesComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Public knowledge, use and attitude toward multivitamin supplementation: A cross-sectional study among general public

Open access
Sekhri, Kavita, Kaur, Kirandeep·2014·International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of supplements has increased substantially in the past few decades. The present study is an effort to explore pattern of use, knowledge and attitude toward consumption of multivitamin supplements among the general public. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study on 120 adult participants from the general public was conducted. The participants were interviewed and information was collected in a predesigned structured questionnaire. The data was analyzed and expressed as counts and percentages. RESULTS: Of the 120 study participants, 66 were males and 54 were females. Results revealed that 68.33% (82) of the participants were users of multivitamin supplements. Out of the users, 69.5% (57) participants consumed on the advice of doctors, 18.2% (15) were self-prescribers while 12.1% (10) relied on advice of family or friends. Among the users, 70.96% considered such supplements to be helpful. Reasons quoted for self-medication use of multivitamins were multiple such as maintenance of general health (55%), to allay weakness or fatigue (20%), to improve appetite (15%) etc. Majority of the participants were unaware regarding the correct indications for multivitamin supplementation. Regarding knowledge about the natural sources of these vitamins, as many as 76% showed ignorance. CONCLUSION: Finding from this study suggests that multivitamin use is highly prevalent and the majority of the participants were ignorant of any possible harm or drug interactions. In light of this, there is a need to adopt certain educational interventions to minimize self-directed supplement use and increase awareness regarding their correct usage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/2229-516x.136780

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An enhanced feeling of well-being, a reduction in mental and physical fatigue, and improvements in psychological and cognitive functions are among the commonly reported motivations for taking supplements.

    “An enhanced feeling of well-being, a reduction in mental and physical fatigue and improvements in psychological and cognitive functions are also among the commonly reported motivations for taking supplements [8,9].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [7]Sesso HD Christen WG Bubes V Smith JP MacFadyen J Schvartz M Multivitamins in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: The Physicians’ Health Study II randomized controlled trial JAMA 2012 308 1751 60 23117775 PMC3501249
  2. [14]Reinert A Rohrmann S Becker N Linseisen J Lifestyle and diet in people using dietary supplements: A German cohort study Eur J Nutr 2007 46 165 73 17377829
  3. [18]The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group N Engl J Med 1994 330 1029 35 8127329
  4. [19]Lippman SM Klein EA Goodman PJ Lucia MS Thompson IM Ford LG Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) JAMA 2009 301 39 51 19066370 PMC3682779
  5. [20]Klein EA Thompson IM Jr Tangen CM Crowley JJ Lucia MS Goodman PJ Vitamin E and the risk of prostate cancer: The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) JAMA 2011 306 1549 56 21990298 PMC4169010
  6. [28]Thomas PR Supplement use among US adults: Implications for the dietetics professional J Am Diet Assoc 2004 104 950 1 15175593

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekhri, K., & Kaur, K.
Affiliations
  • Panjab University (IN)
  • Dayanand Medical College & Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
Sekhri, Kavita
Venue
International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research
Published
2014
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
77
ISSN
2229-516X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980076915
Cited by
48
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
multivitamin supplementation, dietary supplements, supplement use patterns, knowledge and attitudes, self-medication, self-prescription, vitamin sources, health education, drug interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review