Cited by 25Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond

Restoration and the Affective Ecologies of Healing: Buffalo and the Fort Peck Tribes

Open access
Haggerty, JuliaHobson, Rink, ElizabethLynne, McAnally, Robert, Bird, Elizabeth·2018·Conservation and Society

Abstract

Intentional acts of restoration are purported to have a multitude of benefits, not only for non-human nature, but for the people who conduct restoration. Yet, there is limited scholarship that considers the nature of these benefits in all of their complexity, including psychological and spiritual dimensions. Using the case study of the restoration of bison/buffalo by the Sioux and Assiniboine tribes to their reservation in Montana, USA, we observe that ecological restoration can promote and facilitate emergent and dynamic processes of reconnection at the scale of individuals, across species and within community. In an indigenous setting marked by historical trauma and other challenges, these re-connections have therapeutic benefits that align with the relationality that mental health frameworks suggest is a key protective factor for many indigenous people. Affective experiences of and with buffalo play an important role in building and articulating that therapeutic relationality in our case study. Our work points out the importance of access to spaces of affective ecologies and personal investment in spiritual traditions as elements of the therapeutic benefits of restoration in this case, raising questions and possibilities for future research that considers patterns and avenues of diffusion of restoration benefits within social groups more broadly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/cs.cs_16_90

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haggerty, J., Rink, E., McAnally, R., & Bird, E.
Affiliations
  • Montana State University (US)
  • Fort Peck Community College (US)
Venue
Conservation and Society
Published
2018
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
21
ISSN
0972-4923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2776507786
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conservation and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Keywords
ecological restoration, affective ecologies, healing, Sioux, Assiniboine, Indigenous mental health, relationality, historical trauma, spiritual traditions, human-wildlife interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review