Restoration and the Affective Ecologies of Healing: Buffalo and the Fort Peck Tribes
Open accessAbstract
Intentional acts of restoration are purported to have a multitude of benefits, not only for non-human nature, but for the people who conduct restoration. Yet, there is limited scholarship that considers the nature of these benefits in all of their complexity, including psychological and spiritual dimensions. Using the case study of the restoration of bison/buffalo by the Sioux and Assiniboine tribes to their reservation in Montana, USA, we observe that ecological restoration can promote and facilitate emergent and dynamic processes of reconnection at the scale of individuals, across species and within community. In an indigenous setting marked by historical trauma and other challenges, these re-connections have therapeutic benefits that align with the relationality that mental health frameworks suggest is a key protective factor for many indigenous people. Affective experiences of and with buffalo play an important role in building and articulating that therapeutic relationality in our case study. Our work points out the importance of access to spaces of affective ecologies and personal investment in spiritual traditions as elements of the therapeutic benefits of restoration in this case, raising questions and possibilities for future research that considers patterns and avenues of diffusion of restoration benefits within social groups more broadly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community surveys indicate that all communities desire greater access to herds and acquisition of bison meat.
“While community surveys indicate that all communities desire greater access to herds and acquisition of bison meat (Haggerty et al., 2017;McElrone, 2017;Human Ecology Learning and Problem Solving [HELPS] Lab, 2018); there is an institutional need to increase staffing to expand community engagement programming.”
From The Potential of Bison Restoration as an Ecological Approach to Future Tribal Food Sovereignty on the Northern Great Plains (2022) · cites this paper as Haggerty et al., 2017
A key benefit to restoring herds is to enable community consumption and traditional relationship with bison.
“A key benefit to restoring herds is to enable community consumption and traditional relationship with bison (Haggerty et al., 2017;McElrone, 2017;Human Ecology Learning and Problem Solving [HELPS] Lab, 2018).”
From The Potential of Bison Restoration as an Ecological Approach to Future Tribal Food Sovereignty on the Northern Great Plains (2022) · cites this paper as Haggerty et al., 2017
Cites
Heart, M. Y. H. B. (2003) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2003.10399988 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Conceptualizing and measuring historical trauma among American Indian people
Whitbeck, L. B., Adams, G. W., Hoyt, D. R., & Chen, X. (2004) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/b:ajcp.0000027000.77357.31 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Crossing Methodological Borders: Decolonizing Community-Based Participatory Research
Stanton, C. R. (2014) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800413505541 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shamon, H., Cosby, O. G., Andersen, C. L., Augare, H., BearCub Stiffarm, J., Bresnan, C. E., Brock, B. L., Carlson, E., Deichmann, J. L., Epps, A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.826282 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haggerty, J., Rink, E., McAnally, R., & Bird, E.
- Affiliations
- Montana State University (US)
- Fort Peck Community College (US)
- Venue
- Conservation and Society
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21
- ISSN
- 0972-4923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2776507786
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conservation and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
- Keywords
- ecological restoration, affective ecologies, healing, Sioux, Assiniboine, Indigenous mental health, relationality, historical trauma, spiritual traditions, human-wildlife interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review