CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 150Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsParticipatory Visual Research Methods

Crossing Methodological Borders: Decolonizing Community-Based Participatory Research

Stanton, Christine Rogers·2014·Qualitative Inquiry
DOI 10.1177/1077800413505541
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To advance socially just research, scholars—including those who utilize qualitative methodologies—must confront the colonizing reputation that frames such work in Indigenous communities. This article explores the potential for Community-Based Participatory Research to guide the re-envisioning of mainstream conceptions of scholarly control to cross epistemological borders between theory and practice. A project that endeavored to engage Native participants throughout the research process provides context for the discussion of ongoing challenges and emerging possibilities. This work holds implications for participatory research design and implementation in cross-cultural contexts, especially as connected to shifting decolonizing theory to practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077800413505541

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Community-based participatory research (CBPR) designs permit independence, autonomy, and collaborative and participant-led research approaches.

    “Community-based participatory research (CBPR) designs have been established as a framework permitting independence, autonomy, and collaborative and participant-led research approaches (Dadich et al., 2019; Stanton, 2014).”

    From Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes (2023) · cites this paper as Stanton, 2014

  • Stanton's and Olko's work does not extend to design, and Stanton uses a designer-dominated understanding of project timelines.

    “Both show work that does not extend to design, and Stanton uses a designer-dominated understanding of project timelines.”

    From An introduction to radical participatory design: decolonising participatory design processes (2022) · cites this paper as Stanton (2014)

  • Stanton (2014) and Olko (2019) attempt to decolonise community-based PR, also providing no remuneration for community participants.

    “Stanton (2014) and Olko (2019) attempt to decolonise community-based PR, also providing no remuneration for community participants.”

    From An introduction to radical participatory design: decolonising participatory design processes (2022) · cites this paper as Stanton (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Stanton, C. R.
Affiliations
Montana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Stanton, Christine Rogers
ORCID
Stanton, Christine Rogers
Venue
Qualitative Inquiry
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2013-10-29
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
573-583
ISSN
  • 1077-8004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7565
DOI
10.1177/1077800413505541
OpenAlex
W2165335036
Cited by
150
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Qualitative Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
community-based participatory research, decolonization, Indigenous research, theory and practice, research control, participatory research design, cross-cultural research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review