Cited by 10Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Dental clinic: potential source of high-risk screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes

Open access
Jadhav, AjinathN, Tarte, PoojaR, Puri, SantoshK·2019·Indian Journal of Dental Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is predicted that by 2030 diabetes may affect 79.4 million individuals in India. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of diabetes are essential to prevent or delay its acute or chronic complications. It is observed that the number of patients visiting dentists is significantly increased. This opportunity can be used for early identification of diabetes in dental office. This study assesses the feasibility of high-risk screening for diabetes and prediabetes in private dental care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients reporting to the dental clinic. A total of 1150 patients above 40 years of age having one or more risk factors such as family history of diabetes, hypertension, smoking, loss of teeth, and periodontitis were included in the study. Patients were subjected to high-risk screening by random blood sugar (RBS) test. American Diabetes Association criteria indicating normal (RBS 79-140 mg/dL), prediabetic (RBS 140-200 mg/dL), and diabetic (RBS >200 mg/dL) was considered for screening. RESULTS: Among 1150 participants, 64.69% had RBS level within normal range and 20.69% had prediabetic range while 14.60% had RBS level above 200 mg/dL, suggestive of having diabetes. A total of 35.29% patients had hyperglycemia based on random blood glucose level. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that patients who are unaware about their diabetic status visiting a dental clinic having one or more risk factors of diabetes can be used as potential sources for high-risk screening for diabetes using a simple RBS test and oral examination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_80_18

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A similar study in 1,150 dental patients >40 years old in India reported 20.7% and 14.6% meeting criteria for prediabetes and diabetes, respectively, using random blood glucose.

    “A similar study in 1,150 dental patients > 40 years old in India reported 20.7% and 14.6% meeting criteria for prediabetes and diabetes, respectively, using random blood glucose (111).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jadhav, A., Tarte, P., & Puri, S.
Venue
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Published
2019
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
851
ISSN
0970-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999812297
Cited by
10
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Dental Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, diabetes screening, dental clinics, random blood glucose, high-risk screening, diabetes risk factors, periodontitis, early detection of diabetes, private dental care
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dental Clinics, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, India, Prediabetic State, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review