Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current estimates of the economic burden of blindness and visual impairment in India: A cost of illness study

Open access
Mannava, Sunny, Borah, Rishi Raj, Shamanna, B R·2022·Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose: Currently, there are an estimated 4.95 million blind persons and 70 million vision impaired persons in India, out of which 0.24 million are blind children. Early detection and treatment of the leading causes of blindness such as cataract are important in reducing the prevalence of blindness and vision impairment. There are significant developments in the field of blindness prevention, management, and control since the “Vision 2020: The right to sight” initiative. Very few studies have analyzed the cost of blindness at the population level. This study was undertaken to update the information on the economic burden of blindness and visual impairment in India based on the prevalence of blindness in India. We used secondary and publicly available data and a few assumptions for our estimations. Methods: We used gross national income (GNI), disability weights, and loss of productivity metrics to calculate the economic burden of blindness and vision impairment based on the “cost of illness” methodology. Results: The estimated net loss of GNI due to blindness in India is INR 845 billion (Int$ 38.4 billion), with a per capita loss of GNI per blind person of INR 170,624 (Int$ 7,756). The cumulative loss of GNI due to avoidable blindness in India is INR 11,778.6 billion (Int$ 535 billion). The cumulative loss of GNI due to blindness increased almost three times in the past two decades. The potential loss of productivity due to vision impairment is INR 646 billion (Int$ 29.4 billion). Conclusion: These estimates provide adequate information for budgetary allocation and will help advocate the need for accelerated adoption of all four strategies of integrated people-centered eye care (IPCEC). Early detection and treatment of blindness, especially among children, is very important in reducing the economic burden; thus, there is a need for integrating primary eye care horizontally with all levels of primary healthcare.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijo.ijo_2804_21

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Comparison of the economic burden of blindness estimated in 1998 and 2020
Figure 1 Comparison of the economic burden of blindness estimated in 1998 and 2020CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Comparison of the cumulative loss of GNI due to blindness estimated in 1998* and 2020 (GR = 5%). *To compare, we estimated the 1997–98 data based on 20% productivity time lost for caregivers as the original data published has considered 10% productivity time lost for caregivers
Figure 2 Comparison of the cumulative loss of GNI due to blindness estimated in 1998* and 2020 (GR = 5%). *To compare, we estimated the 1997–98 data based on 20% productivity time lost for caregivers as the original data published has considered 10% productivity time lost for caregiversCC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Potential loss of productivity due to various levels of vision impairment
Figure 3 Potential loss of productivity due to various levels of vision impairmentCC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rao, 2000, Vision 2020:The Right to Sight, Community Eye Heal [Internet], 13, 42

Cited by

See all 67

Metadata

Authors
Mannava, S., Borah, R. R., & Shamanna, B. R.
Affiliations
University of Hyderabad (IN)
Corresponding author
Shamanna, B R
Venue
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2022-05-31
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
2141-2145
ISSN
  • 0301-4738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1998-3689
OpenAlex
W4282936352
Cited by
67
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
FWCI
9.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
blindness, visual impairment, economic burden, productivity loss, avoidable blindness, cataract, blindness prevention, India
MeSH terms
Financial Stress, Blindness, Child, Humans, India, Vision, Low, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current estimates of the economic burden of blindness and visual impairment in India: A cost of illness study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/ijo.ijo_2804_21
The paper
Mannava, S., Borah, R. R., & Shamanna, B. R. (2022). Current estimates of the economic burden of blindness and visual impairment in India: A cost of illness study. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_2804_21

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.