Cited by 115Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGender and Technology in EducationSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Nomophobia: A Mixed-Methods Study on Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Perception among College Students in Puducherry, India

Open access
Jilisha, G., Venkatachalam, J., Menon, Vikas, Olickal, Jeby Jose·2019·Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As more people are utilizing smartphones, nomophobia is also on the rise. Several Indian studies have revealed nomophobia among young adults. The severity of nomophobia and related behaviors is underrated and often go unnoticed in India. METHODS: The sociodemographic characteristics, smartphone usage pattern, and perceived ill-health related to smartphone usage of the participants were obtained using a semistructured questionnaire. Twenty-item Nomophobia questionnaire was used to assess nomophobia. In-depth interviews were conducted among students with moderate and severe nomophobia scores. RESULTS: Among the 774 participants, 23.5% had severe nomophobia scores. Older age, male gender, duration and frequency of smartphone usage, use for social networking, checking without reason, and checking smartphone after waking up in the morning were significantly associated with nomophobia. The in-depth interview showed attributes of addiction among the students, like dependency and compulsive behavior. Students also experienced anxiety and frustration when they had to part with their smartphones. CONCLUSION: A sizable minority of the students had signs of severe nomophobia, distinct patterns of usage, and misperceptions regarding health and their usage pattern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_130_19

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yet other studies found that men were more prone to PSU than women.

    “yet other studies found that men were more prone to PSU than women (Aljomaa et al., 2016;Jilisha, Venkatachalam, Menon, & Olickal, 2019;Kwon et al., 2016;Lu et al., 2011).”

    From Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area (2021) · cites this paper as Jilisha, Venkatachalam, Menon, & Olickal, 2019

    The Results report that male gender was significantly associated with higher nomophobia scores among college students. That supports the gender comparison, but the study measured nomophobia rather than problematic smartphone use (PSU) as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jilisha, G., Venkatachalam, J., Menon, V., & Olickal, J. J.
Affiliations
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Venkatachalam, J.
Venue
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
Published
2019-11
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
541-548
ISSN
  • 0253-7176 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-1564
OpenAlex
W2982972302
Cited by
115
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
23.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
nomophobia, smartphone addiction, university students, smartphone usage patterns, anxiety, prevalence, associated factors, Puducherry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review