Cited by 73Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEducational Technology and Pedagogy

ChatGPT for Teachers: Practical Examples for Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Educational Purposes

Open access
Mondal, Himel, Marndi, Gujaram, Behera, Joshil Kumar, Mondal, Shaikat·2023·Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically ChatGPT, has the potential to revolutionize medical education by acting as an interactive virtual tutor and personalized learning assistant. It may help both teachers and students in various ways. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide practical examples of the utilization of ChatGPT for educational purposes in the context of teaching. Materials and Methods: The article presents various scenarios and applications where ChatGPT can be effectively employed by teachers. These examples are based on real-world experiences and observations, showcasing the potential of AI in enhancing educational practices. Results: The article demonstrates how ChatGPT can serve as a valuable tool for teachers in preparation of presentation slide, formulating essay-type, multiple choice, and viva questions, answering students’ queries, making customized content for students according to comprehension capability, evaluation of answers, creating case vignette, plan a lesson, or create contents for blended learning. Conclusion: The findings of this article emphasize the practical implications and benefits of utilizing ChatGPT for educational purposes. Teachers who are overburdened with academic loads can take help from the program. However, teachers must use it with caution as the content created by ChatGPT may have errors or have scientific inaccuracy. Future research should focus on exploring the long-term effects and pedagogical strategies for effective implementation of ChatGPT in educational settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijves.ijves_37_23

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mondal, H., Marndi, G., Behera, J. K., & Mondal, S.
Affiliations
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar (IN)
  • Dharanidhar University, Keonjhar (IN)
  • Nagaland University (IN)
  • Department of Physiology, Raiganj Government Medical College, Raiganj, West Bengal, India
Corresponding author
  • Mondal, Himel
  • Mondal, Shaikat
Venue
Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Published
2023-07
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
200-205
ISSN
  • 0972-0820 (ISSN-L)
  • 2394-0999
OpenAlex
W4384078169
Cited by
73
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7
FWCI
17.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
ChatGPT, artificial intelligence in education, medical education, virtual tutors, personalized learning, question generation, slide preparation, answer evaluation, case vignettes, lesson planning, blended learning, teacher workload, AI-generated content accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review