The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative morphology and microscopy of eight commercially traded spice fruits of Apiaceae
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Herbs and fruits of Apiaceae are used in various traditional medicinal systems for treating various aiilments. They also play an important role in Ayurvedic preparations as active ingredients. Most of these fruits are grown as commercial crops and used as spices. With a high demand for these fruits, there are instances of adulteration and admixture of one to another because of their similarity in appearance. The practice of adulteration may cause variations in the quality of traditional or industrial herbal preparations. Hence, this study focused on differentiating eight closely related and commercially traded Apiaceae fruits through macroscopic and microscopic characteristics. METHODS: Authentic samples of eight commercially traded species were collected from commercial suppliers or taxonomically identified plants. The fruits were tested for macroscopic structures, such as length, size, and microscopic structures, through anatomy, vittae isolation, and sclereids characterization and documenting their similarities and differences. RESULTS: The variations with respect to the vittae lengths and number; and sclereids patterns were identified among the eight studies fruits of Apiaceae, and a dichotomous key is derived based on macroscopy and microscopy for their precise identification. CONCLUSIONS: This study described organoleptic, macroscopic and microscopic characters, especially considering the vittae and sclereids characters of eight commercially traded spice fruits of the family Apiaceae and differentiated them through a dichotomous key which is helpful for their easy and precise identification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Comparative morphological and microscopic studies of commercially traded Apiaceae fruits have revealed distinguishing features in their macroscopic structures, vittae, and sclereids, enabling the development of a dichotomous key for precise identification (Devika et al. 2024).”
From Unlocking the Apiaceae: comprehensive advances in agronomy, biotechnology, phytochemistry, and health applications of major seed spices (2025) · cites this paper as Devika et al. 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Khan, 2016, Phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Carum carvi, Eur J Pharm Med Res, 3, 231
- Al-Snafi, 2017, The pharmacological activities of Cuminum cyminum—A review, IOSR J Pharm, 6, 46
- Corsi, 1998, Secretory structures and localization of alkaloids in Conium maculatum L. (Apiaceae), Ann Bot, 81, 157, 10.1006/anbo.1997.0547 · DOI
- Osman, 2019, Overview of analytical tools for the identification of adulterants in commonly traded herbs and spices, J AOAC Int, 2, 376, 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0389 · DOI
- Dentali, 2013, Organoleptic analysis of herbal ingredients, Am Herb Prod Assoc, 1
- Kapoor, 2015, Studies on the vittae (oil canals) of some important medicinal umbelliferous fruits (Part I), Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad, 33, 1
- Chuang, 1970, A systematic anatomical study of the genus perideridia (Umbelliferae-Apioideae), Am J Bot, 57, 495, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1970.tb09841.x · DOI
- Anubhuti, 2011, Standardization of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), its oleoresin and marketed Ayurvedic dosage forms, Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res, 3, 265
- Bercu, 2012, Comparative histo-anatomical aspects of the fruit of some Apiaceae Lindl. Fruit used for therapeutic purposes, Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol, 17, 265
- Kapoor, 2004, Improved growth and essential oil yield and quality in Foeniculum vulgare on mycorrhizal inoculation supplemented with P-fertilizer, Bioresour Technol, 93, 307, 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.028 · DOI
- Bishr, 2012, Characterization of fennel fruits: Types and quality, Life Sci J, 9, 611
- Rai, 2012, A monographic profile on quality specifications for a herbal drug and spice of commerce—Cuminum cyminum L, Int J Adv Herb Sci Technol, 1, 1
- Zhu, 2014, Study on the microscopic identification of the adulterated plant origin powdered seasonings, J Agric Food Sci, 2, 264
- Saraswathi, 2013, Identification of the botanical sources and TLC/HPTLC pattern of “Ajamoda” in trades, J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 2, 137
- Hardel, 2011, Pharmacognostic studies on Trachyspermum ammi Linn. A powder analysis, Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm, 2, 1272
Cited by
Singh, R., Choudhary, S., Kumari, V., Meena, R. S., Meena, N. K., Y, R., & Verma, A. K. (2025) · Journal of Agriculture and Ecology · doi:10.58628/jae-2521-101
Metadata
- Authors
- Devika, V., Prasanna Kumar, C. N., & Kannan, R.
- Affiliations
- R & D Center, Himalaya Wellness Company, Makali, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
- Venue
- Journal of Drug Research in Ayurvedic Sciences
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-131
- ISSN
- 2279-0357
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.