Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative morphology and microscopy of eight commercially traded spice fruits of Apiaceae

Devika, Venkatasubbaiah, Prasanna Kumar, Chattenahalli Narasimharaju, Kannan, Ramamirthum·2024·Journal of Drug Research in Ayurvedic Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Herbs and fruits of Apiaceae are used in various traditional medicinal systems for treating various aiilments. They also play an important role in Ayurvedic preparations as active ingredients. Most of these fruits are grown as commercial crops and used as spices. With a high demand for these fruits, there are instances of adulteration and admixture of one to another because of their similarity in appearance. The practice of adulteration may cause variations in the quality of traditional or industrial herbal preparations. Hence, this study focused on differentiating eight closely related and commercially traded Apiaceae fruits through macroscopic and microscopic characteristics. METHODS: Authentic samples of eight commercially traded species were collected from commercial suppliers or taxonomically identified plants. The fruits were tested for macroscopic structures, such as length, size, and microscopic structures, through anatomy, vittae isolation, and sclereids characterization and documenting their similarities and differences. RESULTS: The variations with respect to the vittae lengths and number; and sclereids patterns were identified among the eight studies fruits of Apiaceae, and a dichotomous key is derived based on macroscopy and microscopy for their precise identification. CONCLUSIONS: This study described organoleptic, macroscopic and microscopic characters, especially considering the vittae and sclereids characters of eight commercially traded spice fruits of the family Apiaceae and differentiated them through a dichotomous key which is helpful for their easy and precise identification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/jdras.jdras_145_22

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Khan, 2016, Phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Carum carvi, Eur J Pharm Med Res, 3, 231
  2. Al-Snafi, 2017, The pharmacological activities of Cuminum cyminum—A review, IOSR J Pharm, 6, 46
  3. Corsi, 1998, Secretory structures and localization of alkaloids in Conium maculatum L. (Apiaceae), Ann Bot, 81, 157, 10.1006/anbo.1997.0547 · DOI
  4. Osman, 2019, Overview of analytical tools for the identification of adulterants in commonly traded herbs and spices, J AOAC Int, 2, 376, 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0389 · DOI
  5. Dentali, 2013, Organoleptic analysis of herbal ingredients, Am Herb Prod Assoc, 1
  6. Kapoor, 2015, Studies on the vittae (oil canals) of some important medicinal umbelliferous fruits (Part I), Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad, 33, 1
  7. Chuang, 1970, A systematic anatomical study of the genus perideridia (Umbelliferae-Apioideae), Am J Bot, 57, 495, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1970.tb09841.x · DOI
  8. Anubhuti, 2011, Standardization of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), its oleoresin and marketed Ayurvedic dosage forms, Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res, 3, 265
  9. Bercu, 2012, Comparative histo-anatomical aspects of the fruit of some Apiaceae Lindl. Fruit used for therapeutic purposes, Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol, 17, 265
  10. Kapoor, 2004, Improved growth and essential oil yield and quality in Foeniculum vulgare on mycorrhizal inoculation supplemented with P-fertilizer, Bioresour Technol, 93, 307, 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.028 · DOI
  11. Bishr, 2012, Characterization of fennel fruits: Types and quality, Life Sci J, 9, 611
  12. Rai, 2012, A monographic profile on quality specifications for a herbal drug and spice of commerce—Cuminum cyminum L, Int J Adv Herb Sci Technol, 1, 1
  13. Zhu, 2014, Study on the microscopic identification of the adulterated plant origin powdered seasonings, J Agric Food Sci, 2, 264
  14. Saraswathi, 2013, Identification of the botanical sources and TLC/HPTLC pattern of “Ajamoda” in trades, J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 2, 137
  15. Hardel, 2011, Pharmacognostic studies on Trachyspermum ammi Linn. A powder analysis, Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm, 2, 1272

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Devika, V., Prasanna Kumar, C. N., & Kannan, R.
Affiliations
R & D Center, Himalaya Wellness Company, Makali, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Venue
Journal of Drug Research in Ayurvedic Sciences
Published
2024-03
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
119-131
ISSN
2279-0357
Cited by
0
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.