Cited by 5Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical Education

A new method of “student-centered formative assessment” and improving students' performance: An effort in the health promotion of community

Open access
Shahedi, Fateme, Ahmadi, Javad, Sharifi, Tahereh, Seyedhasani, Seyedeh Nahid, Abdollahi, Mahbubeh, Shaabani, Negar, Sarmadi, Mohammad·2020·Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improving the learning process in education will empower medical students, and also formative assessment helps improve the teaching–learning process by providing ongoing reflective information about learning gaps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of student-centered formative assessment by weekly reflective self-correction quizzes on medical laboratory students' performance on the final examination of hematology course in 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A semi-experimental study was conducted on fifty students divided randomly into intervention ( n = 25) and control groups ( n = 25) using convenience sampling in 2018 from Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software version 16, two-sample t -test, Chi-square test, and analysis of covariance. RESULTS: The intervention had positive effects on students' mean test scores in hematology II so that the intervention and control groups managed to obtain 18.45 ± 1.46 and 14.57 ± 2.64, respectively ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that weekly formative assessments along with reflective self-correction activity and active participation of students in the learning process by designing questions could improve student learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/jehp.jehp_753_19

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-assessment supports the development of clinical skills, accountability, and a well-grounded understanding of professional standards.

    “By encouraging learners to evaluate their own progress and reflect critically on their performance, self-assessment supports the development of clinical skills, accountability, and a well-grounded understanding of professional standardsskills essential for success in medical education and practice [123,126].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Song D Student-generated questioning and quality questions: A literature review Res J Educ Stud Rev 2016 2 58 70
  2. [5]Scheerens J Ehren M Sleegers P de Leeuw R OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving school Outcomes Country Background Report for the Netherlands 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shahedi, F., Ahmadi, J., Sharifi, T., Seyedhasani, S. N., Abdollahi, M., Shaabani, N., & Sarmadi, M.
Affiliations
  • Torbat Heydarieh University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Department of Health Care Management, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Corresponding author
Sarmadi, Mohammad
Venue
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Published
2020-01
Volume
9
Pages
136-136
ISSN
  • 2277-9531 (ISSN-L)
  • 2319-6440
OpenAlex
W3040129419
Cited by
5
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Education and Health Promotion (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
medical laboratory students, hematology education, student performance, active learning, medical education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review