Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of respiratory status in patients with myopathy

Open access
Maryam Ghaedrahmati, Ashraf Kazemi, Gholamreza Kheirabadi, Amrollah Ebrahimi, Masoud Bahrami·2017·Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Abstract

Myopathic diseases can lead to significant respiratory disorders due to the involvement of skeletal muscles, including respiratory muscles. These disorders not only affect the quality of life of patients, but are also one of the main causes of mortality in this group. This study aimed to evaluate pulmonary function and its associated factors in patients with myopathy. This is a prospective cross-sectional study that was performed in 2020-2021 on 44 patients with myopathy. The participant’s demographic information and features of disease, including age, sex, type of disease, age of onset and duration of disease, and mobility status of the patient (using Walker or wheelchair) were collected by a checklist. The slow inspiratory vital capacity (VC) and FEV1 were obtained. Data analysis was performed with SPSS version 24 software using t-test, Mann–Whitney, Pearson, and Spearman correlation tests. The sitting and lying FVC were significantly higher in patients who had no drug usage ( P = 0.007 and P = 0.005, respectively), no sputum (0.003 and 0.002, respectively), no dysphagia ( P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively), and no coughs while eating (P = 0.022 and P = 0.006). There were significant inverse relationships between age and sitting FVC ( r = -0.638) and lying FVC ( r = -0.497), and age had a significant direct relationship with changes in the FVC ( r = 0.652) ( P < 0.001 for all). Furthermore, we observed a significantly inverse relationship between age of disease onset and sitting FVC ( r = -0.491, P = 0.001) and significantly direct relationship between age of disease onset and lying FVC ( r = 0.447, P = 0.002) and FVC changes ( r = 0.371, P = 0.013). Assessments of respiratory functions, especially through spirometry in both sitting and supine positions, and attention to clinical symptoms such as dysphagia and cough, are of great clinical importance in the management of myopathy patients. These assessments can help in the early diagnosis of respiratory failure and timely interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.4103/jehp.jehp_916

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Ghaedrahmati, M., Kazemi, A., Kheirabadi, G., Ebrahimi, A., & Bahrami, M.
Venue
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
275-275
ISSN
2277-9531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768685341
Cited by
286
References
69
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of respiratory status in patients with myopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/jehp.jehp_916
The paper
Ghaedrahmati, M., Kazemi, A., Kheirabadi, G., Ebrahimi, A., & Bahrami, M. (2017). Evaluation of respiratory status in patients with myopathy. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.