Cited by 7Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsTemporomandibular Joint DisordersAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Analysis Report of Adherence to Consort Statement for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) Associated with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs): A Cross-Sectional Study

Open access
Shete-Motgi, Anagha, Shete, Mrinal, Bhate, Kalyani, Kshirsagar, Kapil, Kakodkar, Pradnya·2022·Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology

Abstract

Purpose: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and their management are widely sought after by clinicians. They often refer to the reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the literature. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement aims to improve the quality of published RCTs and is endorsed by healthcare journals. Despite the widespread acceptance of CONSORT, its use for reporting clinical trials in the journals remains suboptimal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, to what extent RCTs related to TMDs have adhered to the CONSORT statement. Methodology: RCTs related to TMDs, published in PubMed from January 2017 to March 2021 were retrieved. Each article was assessed for its adherence to the CONSORT statement by four trained and calibrated investigators. Results: 88 articles were evaluated. Out of 37 items in the checklist, only 4 items demonstrated 100% adherence (item 2a, 2b, 5, 12a, and 16). The most under-reported items were 7a, 8b, 9, 10, 17a, 17b, 19, 23, and 24 (less than 50%). The mean percentage of adherence remained 71.2 ± 12.6. Only one study showed 100% adherence and three studies had less than 50% adherence. Considering adherence of abstract checklist, three items demonstrated 100% adherence (items 4, 5, and 6). Poor reporting was noted with items 8, 13, 15, and 16. The mean percentage of adherence to abstract reporting remained 68.60 ± 11.79. Conclusion: The present study indicates good adherence to CONSORT statement in reporting RCTs related to TMD management. Probably the mandatory instructions from the journals and increasing awareness among the researchers about CONSORT reporting might have done the trick.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_273_21

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reports in other dental specialties have produced similar results to the present study.

    “Additionally, reports in other dental specialties, such as restorative dentistry, (Elagami et al. 2024) endodontics, (Cabral et al. 2021) surgery, (Shete-Motgi et al. 2022; Kshirsagar et al. 2021) prosthetics, (Chen et al. 2018; Lempesi et al. 2014) and pediatric dentistry, (Wambier et al. 2022) have produced similar results.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shete-Motgi, A., Shete, M., Bhate, K., Kshirsagar, K., & Kakodkar, P.
Affiliations
Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN)
Corresponding author
Bhate, Kalyani
Venue
Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Published
2022-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
22-26
ISSN
0972-1363 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285261892
Cited by
7
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, CONSORT statement, reporting quality, randomized controlled trials, abstract reporting, TMD management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review