Cited by 14Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Specific Genes Associated with Adverse Events of Methylphenidate Use in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Literature Review

Open access
Joensen, Beinta, Meyer, Morten, Aagaard, Lise·2017·Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review empirical studies examining associations between candidate genes and adverse events (AEs) from methylphenidate (MPH) use in children and adolescents. The PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception until March 2017. We included empirically based articles on pharmacogenetic studies in 0–17-year-old patients that investigated associations between specific candidate genes, their polymorphisms, and reported AEs. We extracted information about study design, setting, type of AE reporter, studied genes and their polymorphisms, age and gender, administered doses, method of genotyping, outcome measures, and main findings. A total of nine articles reporting information about four double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over studies and five open-label cohort studies were eligible for inclusion. Studies were published from 2006 onward and included a total of 998 patients (3–17-year-olds) diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Studies predominantly involved males and lasted from 1 to 12 weeks. Studies used polymerase chain reaction and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping methodology. Reported AEs were significantly associated with the following genes: appetite reduction (CES1*G); buccal-lingual movements (T1065G); diastolic blood pressure (ADRA2A Mspl C/C-GC); emotionality (DAT1*9/9); irritability (SNAP25 T1065G); picking (DRD4*7/DRD4*4); social withdrawal (DRD4*7/DRD4*4); somatic complaints (DAT1*10/10); tics (5-HTTLRP*S/L*L/L; SNAP25 T1065G); sadness (CES1*rsl12443580); and vegetative symptoms (5-HTTLPR). In conclusion, only few MPH pediatric pharmacogenetic studies were located, and large between-study heterogeneity was found. Studies were of naturalistic design and of short duration. They included small patient samples, poorly standardized treatment regimens, and limited outcome assessments. In the future, more pharmacogenomic studies in ADHD are needed, preferably using randomized, controlled study designs and of longer duration (more than 6 months).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_16_161

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1]Polanczyk G de Lima MS Horta BL Biederman J Rohde LA The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: A systematic review and metaregression analysis Am J Psychiatry 2007 164 942 8 17541055
  2. [3]Yoshimasu K Barbaresi WJ Colligan RC Killian JM Voigt RG Weaver AL Gender, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and reading disability in a population-based birth cohort Pediatrics 2010 126 e788 95 20876182 PMC2995945
  3. [4]Pelham WE Jr Greenslade KE Vodde-Hamilton M Murphy DA Greenstein JJ Gnagy EM Relative efficacy of long-acting stimulants on children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: A comparison of standard methylphenidate, sustained-release methylphenidate, sustained-release dextroamphetamine, and pemoline Pediatrics 1990 86 226 37 2196522
  4. [5]Barbaresi WJ Katusic SK Colligan RC Weaver AL Leibson CL Jacobsen SJ Long-term stimulant medication treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Results from a population-based study J Dev Behav Pediatr 2006 27 1 10 16511362
  5. [6]Bolea-Alamañac B Nutt DJ Adamou M Asherson P Bazire S Coghill D Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Update on recommendations from the British association for psychopharmacology J Psychopharmacol 2014 28 179 203 24526134
  6. [8]Aagaard L Hansen EH The occurrence of adverse drug reactions reported for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications in the pediatric population: A qualitative review of empirical studies Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2011 7 729 44 22247615 PMC3256000
  7. [9]Gajria K Lu M Sikirica V Greven P Zhong Y Qin P Adherence, persistence, and medication discontinuation in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - A systematic literature review Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2014 10 1543 69 25187718 PMC4149449
  8. [10]Gabriela ML John DG Magdalena BV Ariadna GS Francisco de LP Liz SM Genetic interaction analysis for DRD4 and DAT1 genes in a group of Mexican ADHD patients Neurosci Lett 2009 451 257 60 19146920
  9. [13]Silberg JL Gillespie N Moore AA Eaves LJ Bates J Aggen S Shared genetic and environmental influences on early temperament and preschool psychiatric disorders in Hispanic twins Twin Res Hum Genet 2015 18 171 8 25728588 PMC4402136
  10. [18]Zeni CP Guimarães AP Polanczyk GV Genro JP Roman T Hutz MH No significant association between response to methylphenidate and genes of the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems in a sample of Brazilian children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2007 144B 391 4 17171656
  11. [19]McGough JJ McCracken JT Loo SK Manganiello M Leung MC Tietjens JR A candidate gene analysis of methylphenidate response in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009 48 1155 64 19858760 PMC2888980
  12. [20]Gruber R Joober R Grizenko N Leventhal BL Cook EH Jr Stein MA Dopamine transporter genotype and stimulant side effect factors in youth diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2009 19 233 9 19519258 PMC2856973
  13. [21]Cho SC Kim BN Cummins TD Kim JW Bellgrove MA Norepinephrine transporter -3081(A/T) and alpha-2A-adrenergic receptor MspI polymorphisms are associated with cardiovascular side effects of OROS-methylphenidate treatment J Psychopharmacol 2012 26 380 9 21628343
  14. [22]Johnson KA Barry E Lambert D Fitzgerald M McNicholas F Kirley A Methylphenidate side effect profile is influenced by genetic variation in the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-associated CES1 gene J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2013 23 655 64 24350812
  15. [23]Bruxel EM Salatino-Oliveira A Genro JP Zeni CP Polanczyk GV Chazan R Association of a carboxylesterase 1 polymorphism with appetite reduction in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treated with methylphenidate Pharmacogenomics J 2013 13 476 80 22688218
  16. [24]Stein MA Waldman I Newcorn J Bishop J Kittles R Cook EH Jr Dopamine transporter genotype and stimulant dose-response in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2014 24 238 44 24813374 PMC4064733
  17. [25]Park SY Kim EJ Cheon KA Association between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and tics after treatment with methylphenidate in Korean children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2015 25 633 40 26402385 PMC4615776
  18. [26]Beger RD Dunn W Schmidt MA Gross SS Kirwan JA Cascante M Metabolomics enables precision medicine: “A white paper, community perspective” Metabolomics 2016 12 149 27642271 PMC5009152
  19. [27]Hong EP Park JW Sample size and statistical power calculation in genetic association studies Genomics Inform 2012 10 117 22 23105939 PMC3480678

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joensen, B., Meyer, M., & Aagaard, L.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Joensen, Beinta
Venue
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Published
2017-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
65-72
ISSN
  • 2279-042X (ISSN-L)
  • 2319-9644
OpenAlex
W2621291491
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
methylphenidate, pharmacogenetics, candidate genes, adverse drug reactions, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, pediatric patients, single nucleotide polymorphisms, CES1, DAT1, DRD4, SNAP-25, 5-HTTLPR, ADRA2A, tics, irritability, social withdrawal, somatic symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review