The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 50 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury
Open accessAbstract
Dura closure following surgery for traumatic brain injury is important to maintain the structural integrity of the brain and serve as a barrier to prevent infection and leakage of cerebrospinal fluid. Although an artificial dural mater can provide barrier capabilities, its performance in the repair of injured neural cells and neuroprotection during the secondary injury stage can be improved. Therefore, we designed and manufactured a multi-layer nanofibrous dura mater containing minocycline and insulin-like growth factor 1 using electrospinning technology to repair tissue following traumatic brain injury. The results showed that the multi-layer nanofibrous dura mater promoted neuronal process transection, hypoxia, and glucose deprivation, as well as survival and neurite extension of SH-SY5Y cells after oxidative stress injury. Minocycline hydrochloride and insulin growth factor 1 were separately incorporated into the fibers to facilitate their differential dual release for immunomodulation during the early stage of traumatic brain injury and provide neuroprotection during the repair process. In addition, the multi-layered nanofibrous dura mater promoted the increase in M2 polarization for microglia and the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, which enhanced neural cell survival. Furthermore, we verified the antibacterial, anti-adhesion, barrier performance, anti-leakage, and biocompatibility capabilities of the multi-layered nanofibrous dura mater. Therefore, our multi-layered nanofibrous dura mater containing minocycline and insulin-like growth factor 1 has great potential as a substitute for dura mater and promotes nerve recovery following traumatic brain injury.
Overview
CoChat Summary
TL;DR
The paper reports a three-layer nanofibrous dura mater (MNDM) with a dual core-shell inner layer that rapidly releases minocycline hydrochloride (MH) and sustainably releases IGF-1. In vitro and rat TBI models, the MH+IGF-MNDM promoted damaged neural cell survival and neurite regeneration, modulated microglial polarization, and showed antibacterial, anti-adhesive, barrier, anti-leakage, and biocompatibility properties.
Key findings
- The MNDM was successfully fabricated with an outer PCL/HA-NDM, middle PCL-NDM, and inner MH+IGF-NDM layer; thickness was approximately 180–250 μm, fiber diameters were about 300–550 nm for PCL/HA-NDM and PCL-NDM and 450–700 nm for MH+IGF-NDM. The MH+IGF-MNDM had tensile strength 9.88 ± 0.6 MPa and maximum strain 53.99% ± 6.5%, versus 10.27 ± 0.73 MPa and 27.95% ± 3.6% for MH+IGF-NDM; normal human dura mater was reported as 7.2 ± 0.4 MPa. At 180 days degradation, MH+IGF-MNDM retained 84% ± 2% of initial mass and pH remained 7.25–7.5.
- Drug release was differential: MH cumulative release reached 51.81% ± 2.08% within 1 hour, 68.32% ± 2.4% from 1–12 hours, and 76.59% ± 0.46% by day 3. The core-layer model drug rhodamine B released over up to 42 days, increasing from 29.2% ± 6.7% to 44.91% ± 8% over days 1–5, to 63.6% ± 5.8% over days 5–14, and to 94.2% ± 2.9% over days 14–42.
- In SH-SY5Y neurite transection, oxidative stress, and OGD injury models, MH+IGF-NDM and IGF-NDM groups showed significantly longer average and longest neurites and higher cell viability than other groups, with apoptosis after OGD significantly lower in MH+IGF-NDM and IGF-NDM groups (P < 0.01). MH-NDM/MH groups showed lower iNOS and higher arginase-1 than LPS and NDM groups (P < 0.001), and MH-NDM reduced NO release (P < 0.001). In TBI rats, TNF-α and IL-1β were lower in TBI+MH+IGF-MNDM than TBI (P < 0.01) and not significantly different from sham (P > 0.05).
- MH+IGF-NDM and MH-NDM had significantly higher antibacterial rates against S. aureus and E. coli than IGF-NDM and NDM (P < 0.001). PCL/HA-NDM reduced NIH3T3 adhesion at 6 and 12 hours (P < 0.001), reduced viability over days 1–5 (P < 0.01), and lowered Ki67 expression (P < 0.05). MH+IGF-MNDM blocked fibroblast penetration and showed no rhodamine B fluorescence penetration at 5, 10, 30, or 60 minutes; >95% SH-SY5Y and NIH3T3 cells survived in biocompatibility tests, and in vivo implantation showed reduced inflammation from 3 to 7 days.
Methods
- Fabrication: three nanofibrous layers were prepared by electrospinning. The outer layer was PCL/HA, the middle layer was PCL, and the inner layer was a coaxial/emulsion electrospun MH+IGF-NDM with MH in the shell and IGF-1 in the core; scaffolds were crosslinked by glutaraldehyde fumigation.
- In vitro characterization and assays: SEM, contact angle, fluorescence microscopy, TEM, drug release, mechanical testing, and degradation were performed. Nerve injury used SH-SY5Y cells in neurite transection, OGD, and H2O2 oxidative stress models; inflammation used LPS-stimulated BV2 cells; anti-adhesion and barrier assays used NIH3T3 cells; antibacterial testing used S. aureus and E. coli; anti-leakage used rhodamine B; biocompatibility used live/dead staining and CCK-8.
- In vivo: subcutaneous implantation used six male Sprague–Dawley rats with n = 3 per group/time point at 3 and 7 days. TBI used 18 male Sprague–Dawley rats divided into sham, TBI, and TBI + MH + IGF-MNDM groups (n = 6 each), with a controlled impact injury and ELISA for TNF-α and IL-1β at postoperative day 3. Statistical analysis used independent t-tests or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test, P < 0.05.
Limitations
- Stated: rhodamine B was used as a model drug for the core layer, but it does not directly reflect IGF-1 release behavior; the authors plan further IGF-1 release studies.
- Stated: the study did not systematically investigate the specific signaling mechanisms, such as nuclear factor kappa-B and IGF-1/PI3K/AKT pathways, by which the MNDM regulates the inflammatory microenvironment and neuroprotection.
- Evident from the text: the in vivo TBI experiment assessed only TNF-α and IL-1β at day 3, with no long-term functional, behavioral, or histological brain-repair outcomes reported; antibacterial testing was limited to S. aureus and E. coli, and barrier/anti-leakage evaluations were largely in vitro.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 Valid · 1 Not valid · 29 Not checked · 139 Own results and interpretations
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“no signs of delamination were found in the cross-sectional sections of the MNDM”
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Results > Characterization of the nanofibrous dura mater
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“both the average and longest neurite lengths of the OGD-treated group were significantly shorter than those of the control group”
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Results > Construction of the nerve injury model
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we prepared nanofibers with a dual-core-shell structure by combining emulsion electrospinning and coaxial electrospinning technologies.”
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Results > Characterization of the nanofibrous dura mater
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fibers in each layer were randomly arranged to form an interwoven fiber network.”
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Results > Characterization of the nanofibrous dura mater
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average and longest neurite lengths in the transected group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001; Figure 2E and F).”
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Results > Construction of the nerve injury model
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
80 more claims
Create a free account to see all 169 claims and to verify the 43 references still open.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 69
- Probably not a substantial claim. 17
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Methods > Fabrication and characterization of the nanofibrous dura mater
“PCL was added to HFIP at a mass volume ratio of 10% (w/v) and stirred thoroughly using a magnetic stirrer until complete dissolution of the PCL was achieved to obtain a PCL/HA spinning solution.”
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Methods > Fabrication and characterization of the nanofibrous dura mater
“The PCL random nanofiber membrane was prepared using an electrospinning device to produce a middle NDM (PCL-NDM).”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Results > Nanofibrous dura mater promotes immunomodulation and neural survival
“(A–D) Effect of the MH + IGF-NDM on the polarization phenotype of BV2 cells.”
§ Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury > Methods > Anti-inflammatory evaluation
“The cells were assigned to five groups: control group without LPS induction, LPS group, LPS + dura mater without drug group (NDM group), LPS + MH-loaded dura mater (MH-NDM group), and LPS + MH drug (MH group).”
Citations
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 · Cited by 5,939
Microglia Function in the Central Nervous System During Health and Neurodegeneration
Colonna, M., & Butovsky, O. (2017) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052358 · Cited by 2,894
Wound healing, fibroblast heterogeneity, and fibrosis
Talbott, H. E., Mascharak, S., Griffin, M., Wan, D. C., & Longaker, M. T. (2022) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2022.07.006 · Cited by 795
Fibroblast and myofibroblast activation in normal tissue repair and fibrosis
Younesi, F. S., Miller, A. E., Barker, T. H., Rossi, F. M. V., & Hinz, B. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00716-0 · Cited by 681
Transcranial amelioration of inflammation and cell death after brain injury.
Roth, T. L., Nayak, D., Atanasijevic, T., Koretsky, A. P., Latour, L. L., & McGavern, D. B. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12808 · Cited by 574
Song, Y., Li, Z., He, T., Qu, M., Jiang, L., Li, W., Shi, X., Pan, J., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., et al. (2019) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.30879 · Cited by 487
Self-citationMental Health Consequences of Traumatic Brain Injury
Howlett, J. R., Nelson, L. D., & Stein, M. B. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.09.024 · Cited by 389
Electrospinning Nanofibers for Therapeutics Delivery
Shahriar, S. M. S., Mondal, J., Hasan, M. N., Revuri, V., Lee, D. Y., & Lee, Y.-K. (2019) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano9040532 · Cited by 301
In Vitro Models of Traumatic Brain Injury
Morrison, B., Elkin, B. S., Dollé, J.-P., & Yarmush, M. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124706 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Fabrication of Tissue Constructs and Organoids Using Electrospun Micro/Nanofibers
Wu, T. S., Hao, R., Su, Q., Sun, L., Zhang, T., Du, J., Fu, M., Wang, Y., Xue, J., & Li, X. (2026) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c01140 · Cited by 4
Self-citationShen, H., Jia, M., Zhu, H., Shang, Y., Wang, L., Gao, H., Liu, Y., Xiao, C., Yang, Y., Han, Q., et al. (2026) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.06.048
Ashby, L., Crowe, M. G., Chakravarty, D., Medam, S., Frampton, G. A., Das, A. B., Hormuth, D. A., Yankeelov, T. E., Wang, V. Y. C., Noble‐Haeusslein, L. J., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2536755123
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S., Zhang, X., Guo, Q., Yan, Y., Fu, M., Wang, Y., & Wu, T.
- Affiliations
- Qingdao University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Yuanfei
- Wu, Tong
- Venue
- Neural Regeneration Research
- Published
- 2025-09-29
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4275-4289
- ISSN
- 1673-5374 (ISSN-L)
- 1876-7958
- PMC
- PMC13561431
- OpenAlex
- W4414613663
- Semantic Scholar
- 6f987e54cca09b9e645ce46da67c7070f73be2a4
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neural Regeneration Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Qingdao Key Health Discipline Development Fund (2025-2027)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171322)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2024JQ026)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, nanofibrous scaffolds, electrospinning, minocycline, insulin-like growth factor I, dual drug release, neuroprotection, oxidative stress, SH-SY5Y cells, anti-inflammatory cytokines, antibacterial properties, adhesion prevention, immunomodulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-15, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-15 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-25-00621
- The paper
- Chen, S., Zhang, X., Guo, Q., Yan, Y., Fu, M., Wang, Y., & Wu, T. (2026). Complex bioactive nanofibrous dura mater repairs traumatic brain injury. Neural Regeneration Research. https://doi.org/10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-25-00621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.