Cited by 1Linguistics and Language AnalysisArabic Language Education StudiesEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

THE ACT OF DIRECTIVE SPEECH IN LEARNING PROCESS AT 8THGRADE NURUL IKHLAS YUNIOR HIGHT SCHOOL

Open access
Romadani, Lesly, Agustina, Agustina, Manaf, Ngusman·2019·Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Education, ICLLE 2019, 22-23 August, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain the types of directive speech acts and the strategy used in directive speech acts by teachers in classroom learning.This type of research is a mixture of qualitative and quantitative research. The data source is the teacher's speech act in learning in class V

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289510

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No one has comprehensively undertaken a specific study of illocutionary acts.

    “From those studies, the researchers found that no one has comprehensively undertaken a specific study of illocutionary acts.”

    From A SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS: ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS PRODUCED BY TEACHER IN ESL CLASSROOM (2023) · cites this paper as Romadani et al. (2019)

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that directive speech-act strategies in classroom learning had not been thoroughly studied. That is a narrower gap than the claim: the paper does not say that no one has comprehensively studied illocutionary acts generally, and it describes prior research on directive speech acts. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Leech G. Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik Jakarta: Universitas Press Indonesia. (1993)
  2. Kasper G. Politneses:The Enclyclopedia Of Lamguage adan Linguistic Perganon Prss: Oxford. (1994)
  3. John S. Speech Acts: An Essay In The Philosophy Of language Cambridge: University Press. (1969)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romadani, L., Agustina, A., & Manaf, N.
Affiliations
Universitas Negeri Padang (ID)
Corresponding author
Manaf, Ngusman
Venue
Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Education, ICLLE 2019, 22-23 August, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Publisher
EAI
Published
2019
OpenAlex
W2990822193
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Arabic Language Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
directive speech acts, teacher speech acts, classroom discourse, classroom language, speech act types, speech act strategies, junior high school teachers, 8th grade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review